I hate to agree with Kellerman but it would be such a sick win that he would be right up there. He is such a warrior
JMM's brutal KO win over prime Pac > Floyd's win over faded injured Pac and drained pre-prime, pre-PED canelo.
I agree it was I never argued that, ko of the decade. With that said was Bradley's win better than jmms? What about a faded erik Morales win over pac? Was that better than jmm? What about Sangsurat? He gave pac the business and khtfo! What about his? Or what about a no hoper in torrecampo ko win? The first man to beat pac. I say that was a special win and deserves an honorable mention, don't you agree? You know when you have as many loses and ko loses as pac has you can debate which win over him was the best. With other fighters not so much.
Pac has wins over Cotto, Marquez, Bradley x2 and Thurman at WW, Floyd doesnt have 5 wins at WW that are better than those.
Pbfs win over pac is better than any one win pac has. Pbfs win over Mosley is great as well and so is his win over jmm and hatton.
Even if Pacquiao loses, he will still be one of the greatest fighters ever. It would be remarkable if Pacquiao beat a prime champion now to become the clear top ww. I rank Crawford higher than Spence but a win over Spence and Thurman tops anything Crawford has done.
Pacquiao takin L's in congress and he is getting terracompoed in debates. So hopefully he redeems himself with an emphatic win in the ring where he belongs.He is no match for intellects it is beyond his realm so therefore stick be the babarain savage in the ring ferocious pacific typhoon that passes through once in a millennia.
If Spence gets knocked down (s) early in the fight like in Thurman/Pacquiao fight then Spence might get beaten by decisions.
And as usual, you have no response. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are you? I'm not surprised that it flew right over your head.