Max Kellerman.

It has nothing to do with race dummy. Anyone who knows boxing can see that RJJ is more knowledgeable about boxing than Kellerman is. He offers astute ****ysis and is usually spot on with it.:deal Paulie Malignaggi is very good to Lennox Lewis for example was very poor. It might be about race with you though troll.

 

I like Kellerman just fine, but "rumble young man rumble"?... c'mon bruh

 

Lennox really is atrocious. Nice man but so inarticulate. It's like, in football (UK), we have all these great players who become **** pundits. Alan Shearer has absolutely no clue why he was so good, it was just instinct.

 

Exactly great fighter but sucked as an ****yst. SRL is another example of this.

 

:yep

 

Kellerman is too much of a fanboy, he loves Ward, GGG and Loma way too much.

 

I've really warmed to him over the last several years. Not a bad commentator.

 

He's one of those illuminati pos.

 

Aside from his exaggerated pronunciation of words, I don't have a problem with him. He's good.

 

I mean, he isn't perfect, but overall I do approve.

 

I cannot stand Roy. He often picks a side and us unwilling to budge even when Max or Jim make good points. Plus his voice is terrible and he sounds like he's rapping all the time.

 

His eyes are too big and he's very metro looking. Oh wait, as a commentator...he has excellent diction and doesn't butcher the English language like boxer-commentators often do. It's hard to take someone serious when they can't even articulate properly.

Ya kno I'm talkin bout? No! You need to explain it properly.

RJJ is hard to take serious, not because of articulation as much as his self-righteous attitude. He has to compare everyone to him in a sub-standard way and he's annoying in the fact that his insecurity causes him to not focus necessarily on the truth sometimes.
Max couldn't take a lazy jab to the arm in the ring, but he's passionate about the sport. That said, he sometimes takes liberties with his perceived boxing knowledge.
So there you have it, we need both types to balance each other.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G928A using Tapatalk

 

Max on a scale of 1 to 10


Somewhere between a 7 and an 8.

 

Kellerman is great. He knows boxing history, too.
He's one guy I can listen to forever when talking boxing.

 

Jones is more knowledgeable when it comes to talking x's and o's and anticipating fighter tendency and trap setting.
Kellerman though is by far more knowledgeable of the history of the sport and does understand style issues between fighters.

Kellerman imo is very good at what he does but with every ****yst at HBO is hampered and held back by prefight agenda scripts and really cant say what he really thinks about fighters and whats happening in the ring.