Max Schmeling is overrated and/or his resume is dependent on the Louis win

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by HistoryZero26, Feb 28, 2026.


  1. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,116
    6,168
    Jan 6, 2024
    I want to make my case for Schmelings resume being overly dependent on the Louis win. In some ways this is similar to Frazier with Ali but I think Schmeling is more dependent on the Louis win for reasons I will outline below. His resume is full of shortcomings that usually otherwise get called out.

    1)Schmeling is 2-3 against his 5 best HW opponents which would be Louisx2, Sharkeyx2 and Max Baer. Given he was losing his DQ win against Sharkey he should really be 1-4 with 3 bad losses.

    2)Once we go those 5 fights Schmeling did not really fight the best HWs of his era. HW titlists Schmeling beat include Uzcudcin(IBU) Stribling(NBA) Hueser(IBU) and Foord(CW). Stribling and Hueser were P4P ATG greats as was Mickey Walker but these fighters were more great fighters then great HWs. Besides Louis and Sharkey the only top 10 HWs of the era Schmeling beat was Uzcudchin. I'd have Uzcudchin at the very bottom of that top 10. Schmeling wasn't exactly dominant against Uzcudchin either going 2-0-1 with 3 decisions.

    Beyond those guys Schmelings best wins were Dudas, Nueselx2, Harry Thomas, Risko and Diener. Schmeling avenged his losses to Hamas and Gypsey Daniels. This was a very deep era and those were fine fighters but thats not a great list for best wins.

    Names missing from Schmelings resume include Braddock, John Henry Lewis, Farr, Carnera, Loughran, Godoy, Schaaf, Pastor, Mann, Lazek, Red Burman, Al Gainer, Al McCoy, Les Kennedy, Ettore, Lazek, McCorkingdale, Tiger Jack Fox, Heeney, Tuffy, Jim Maloney, King Levinsky, Gunnar Barlund and Adamick. And this is the smaller part of the list because I want to touch on the lack of larger opponents seperate.


    3)Like Frazier Schmelings resume is especially missing the larger opponents. Besides Louis Foord is the only guy 6'2 or taller Schmeling beat. Schmelings record against such opponents is 2-3 with losses to Louis, Max Baer and Larry Gains.

    6'2 or taller missing from Schmelings resume include Carnera Braddock and Schaaf from point 3) but also Buddy Baer, Abe Simon, Godfrey, Pierre Charles, Santa, Victorio Campolo, Valentin Campolo, Phil Scott, Art Lasky, Retzlaff, Hankinson, Elmer Ray, Lenglet, Hower, Roscoe Toles, Otto Van Porat, Ray Imp, Lovell, Ludwig Haymann, Roberti, Der Veer, Cobb, Seal Harris. No Gastanaga with the 86 inch reach. No weight bully Galento. This is about 30 larger fighters Schmeling didn't fight who were highly regarded at some point from 1927-1939.


    5)Schmeling was not active. From the time he won the IBU HW belt in 1928 to the WW2 induced end of his main career Schmeling fought 22 times in a little over 11 years. Averaging just 2 fights a year as a high end HW. This does not compare well to the activity of his peers. Except Sharkey, but I'm not ranking Sharkey above Schmeling.

    6)Schmeling was knocked out 5 times despite avoiding most of the more dangerous fighters in the division and fighting half as much as a Tommy Farr. One thing that set Braddock, John Henry Lewis, Loughran and even a Carnera aside is how few times they got knocked down and out.

    7)The manner in which Louis won the rematch could not have done more to suggest the first fight was a fluke. Normally this would matter. For whatever reason it hasn't here.

    I still think Schmeling is in the same class as Lewis, Braddock, Farr, Max Baer and Loughran but I see him more as this groups worst member(along with Sharkey) not its best. The reason he has a win over Louis and they do not is Schmeling fought him at the right time.

    You can make a lot of excuses for why Schmeling fought who he did. Mickey Walker had the Sharkey draw and Stribling was NBA champ. Carnera and Schmeling sorta missed each other with their career trajectorys. I'm not blaming Schmeling for what happened so much as observing what happened.
     
    imjustasking!!, Fogger and Yorbals like this.
  2. Yorbals

    Yorbals Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,331
    3,015
    Jul 28, 2025
    Agreed, if his surname was Nelling, I’d say Nelling, Schmeling
     
  3. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Loyal Member

    31,828
    42,798
    Jul 4, 2014
    His resume is dependent on the Louis win? Duh. In other news, dog bites man.

    All the fighters you named are good fighters. Schmeling himself started out at LHW, so it doesn't much matter some of the guys he beat were on the lighter side. As for Sharkey, the title "win" was a disgrace, but most feel that Schmeling won the second and "wuz robbed," so it evens out.

    Naw, Schmeling's fine.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    71,997
    28,007
    Feb 15, 2006
    I don't agree at all.

    The elephant in the room regarding Schmeling's resume, which time has obscured somewhat, is that he beat everybody at their absolute summit, and was often the only person to knock them out.

    Johnny Risko, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him.

    Paulino Uzcdun, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him.

    Jack Sharkey, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him, albeit by DQ.

    Young Stribling, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him.

    Mickey Walker, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him.

    Walter Neusel, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him.

    Steve Hamas, his absolute peak is when Schmeling avenges his defeat against him.

    The consistent pattern is that he takes on the most dangerous contenders available, and beats them in their now or never moment.

    His decision to challenge Louis merely follows this pattern.
     
  5. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,631
    1,826
    Aug 18, 2012
    Schmeling was either heavyweight champion or a top heavyweight contender for a decade 1929-1938. He was an excellent technical fighter with one of boxings best right hands.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,230
    49,569
    Apr 27, 2005
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    66,133
    53,518
    Feb 11, 2005
    This. Well deliniated @janitor.
     
  8. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,185
    27,656
    Jan 3, 2007
    It’s true that the Louis win is the cornerstone of Schmeling’s legacy. But I wouldn’t say that he’s overrated or that it’s the only thing he has. Max was a heavyweight champion of the world before Joe Louis came around and in fact beat three other hall of fame inductees and a handful of contenders. That’s enough to be in the HOF without the Louis win.
    On a side note: Schmeling was lined up to challenge for Braddock’s title. But Braddock’s people struck a deal with Louis’s management promising Braddock a percentage of Joe’s future earnings. Schmeling got screwed out of a title shot and one that he quite possibly may have won.
     
    KasimirKid and JohnThomas1 like this.
  9. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,631
    1,826
    Aug 18, 2012
    Schmeling was all set to fight Braddock. Tickets and posters for the bout were printed.
     
  10. HistoryZero26

    HistoryZero26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,116
    6,168
    Jan 6, 2024
    This is true but none of this addresses what I've said.

    Stribling and Mickey Walker are P4P greats and were next in line as I acknowledge at the end of my post but that doesn't mean they were the most dangerous. Striblings knockouts over Scott and Van Porat were as much outliers as Sharkeys over Scott and Loughran.

    You can apply this argument to most opponents a champion or top contender fights because whoever they are fighting is going to be near their peak. Sometimes they fight a big name whose seen better days but usually an opponent will be at their best. Thats why they got the fight.

    "Jack Sharkey, his absolute peak is when Schmeling beats him, albeit by DQ."

    This made me laugh. Its technically true. Schmeling won the belt fair and square thats the rules.
     
  11. Rubber Glove Sandwich

    Rubber Glove Sandwich 'Iranian flag green' reflecting pool Full Member

    2,361
    3,349
    Aug 15, 2020
    Even if his resume was dependent on one name (maybe it is, maybe it isn't) that's enough to get him pretty far in a historically weak division like heavyweight.
     
  12. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,598
    9,180
    Oct 8, 2013
    Schmeling is underrated if anything, a solid resume lost to the passage of time. As above posters pointed out, he fought opponents consistently at their best. Not only that, he stopped many iron chinned warriors of the era. Look how many times Louis was stopped, Risko, Hamas and how about Stribling! Then look at the one guy that ko’d all of them. Schmeling was a dynamite puncher.
    He was totally robbed against Sharkey in the rematch and in the first fight he won on a legit serious low blow. (And look at Sharkey’s track record with low blow shenanigans, not just this fight and the Dempsey fight)
    He beat Uzcudon - 2 times and it should have been 3 of 3 the draw was a dubious result by the Spanish referee in which the result was loudly booed.
    Then look at how he was cheated not once but twice at enhancing his legacy. He got robbed of making more title defenses by the Sharkey rematch. Then he fights and beats arguably the best heavyweight ever, and instead of being rewarded with Braddock he is cut out of the picture. A fight he likely wins. Then he goes to sign and fight Tommy Farr and Louis’s team undercuts him and outbids to make Farr Louis’s first title defense.
    Is it an all time resume no, but he has wins over 4 hall of famers. Multiple fights of year and arguably was involved in the biggest fight in the sports history.
    He still makes my top 20 heavyweights on the back end.
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2026
  13. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,631
    1,826
    Aug 18, 2012
    Schmeling was one of the most technically astute heavyweight champions. His victory over Louis was much more than a right hand over a low left. It was a master class of technical boxing. Max is a top 15 ATG heavyweight champion in my book.
     
  14. HOUDINI

    HOUDINI Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,631
    1,826
    Aug 18, 2012
    Of the fighters Schmeling “missed” fighting can you show where fights against these heavyweights were offered to Schmeling but turned down? A bout between Braddock and Schmeling was to happen for the title, tickets and advertisements were printed, but Braddock walked away to fight Louis.
     
  15. KasimirKid

    KasimirKid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,353
    3,553
    Jun 1, 2018
    I wanted to respond to this thread, but no need. You guys got this!
     
    Jackomano likes this.