Maybe I saw a different fight...(Alvarez/Trout)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by illwill007, Jul 19, 2013.


  1. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Had it 8-4 with the KD for Canelo. If someone wanted to argue 7-5, fine, but I don't see how Trout could've won unless someone literally looked for any way possible to give him the fight.

    This was also a case here commentary painted a misleading picture; they were still going on about Trout's jab rounds after it'd been neutralized, for example.
     
  2. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    I felt it was a clear victory for Canelo when I watched it. Certainly not close enough to make any argument for trout.
     
  3. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    I think the Malick Scott vs. Glaskov fight is another example of commentators swaying the public. It certainly wasn't a domination.
     
  4. iceferg

    iceferg Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,348
    2,312
    Apr 25, 2008
    I just want to make it clear now. I do not believe that Broner landed more than Malinaggi. I know that's what the compubox said but i do not believe it.
     
  5. Samurai's Slice

    Samurai's Slice ESB Legend Full Member

    19,069
    2
    Jun 27, 2011
    :happy

    Yes. Canelo landed exceptionally harder than Broner against Malignaggi. He put Trout down. Trout slapped a lot, as did Malignaggi.