Mayweather and Pacquiao Ain't Fighting Till Next Year... If Ever

he doesn't want the fight because of taxes??

 

lol::good

 

I think floyd just injured his vagina to be honest!!

 

Id venture as far to say Floyd ko/tko mid to late rounds. I think the first few rounds might be exciting and you might see Mayweather get hit on the arms and gloves a lot, maybe the body. But eventually Pac will get sloppy and Mayweather will startpicking him apart with straight rights and eventually stop him.

 

Pac doesn't get sloppy and you can't name 1 fight in which he has.

That is a completely absurd analysis of the fight.

 

Hes never fought someone that has anywhere near the defensive skill of Mayweather. The closest he's come is Clottey who just shelled up the entire fight. Mayweather is one of the most, if not THE most frustrating fighter to fight against.

I can name a few fights where Pac throws caution to the wind and gets sloppy. Morales 1, both Marquez fights. And I certainly dont think that analysis qualifies as absurd. But hopefully the fight will get made and we'll see what happens.

 

Pac got sloppy in the cotto and clottey fight, he got caught with punches he shouldn't have. Pac even admits this in post fight interviews.

 

When he says "I wanted to prove I could take his punches, they said I couldnt" ?????

Give me a ****ing break, he schooled cotto, and cotto is my favorite fighter.

He was sloppy vs clottey?!!??! LMAO

hit the ****in bricks you *****.

 

Post some videos of Pac getting sloppy.

I'm not even a big fan of pacquiao, but that is ****ing ******ed.

 

Someone posted a vid of pacs greatest hits. There are some clips of it in there. Why is it ******ed? Its absolutely unfathomable that Pac, who before his move to 147 had an all out blitzing, buzzsaw style could get sloppy? Be realistic. Hes an amazing fighter, p4p the best until Mayweather proves otherwise in my book, but hes not a god.

 

And im by no means a *****. I absolutely loath Floyd Mayweather. But based on styles thats just how I see the fight playing out.

 

Your usage of the term sloppy is completely misguided.

Sloppy is how PW fought Martinez.

When has pac ever done that?
Even in losing he beats the **** out of his opponent.

I pick mayweather to beat pac by a decision, but to say it's because pacquiao is sloppy is basically admitting you have paid no attention to his career and know jack **** about boxing.

 

Arum is already looking for other fights. Not a good sign

 

You know how to tell when someone really has no argument about a topic? They just post random insults and accuse everyone else of knowing jack **** about boxing.

If you have a different opinion thats fine. No need to get all butt-hurt about like I ****ed your mom or stole your girlfriend. Did you watch the clips? Pac has an all out blitzing style, especially at the lower weights, not so much since he has been fighting at welterweight. He comes forward throwing non-stop punches leaving himself wide open for counters...watch both Marquez fights and the first Morales fight. Im sure there are many others as well. That is sloppy boxing. You can call it misguided if you want to, but lets be honest, youre not Bert Sugar and youre on a boxing forum, you're not an ESPN analyst. So lets not act like you're the utmost authority on boxing. Not to mention the fact that I just dont really give a **** what you think.

Again...how I see the fight playing out...Pac wins the first few rounds on volume alone...possibly lands some shots but starts getting frustrated at Mayweathers defense. Starts opening up to land shots, maybe tries to go all out and starts getting countered with straight rights. Mayweather definitely has excellent timing and while he may not have one punch knock out power, he certainly has enough pop in his punches to rattle pacs brain. He lands enough, Pac continues to get frustrated, opens himself up even more going for the knockout and gets tko'd/ko'ed in the process.

If you disagree thats fine. Simply state it and move on. Dont act like a girl and try to start an argument. Theres a reason why YOU get into arguments with almost everyone on these forums in every thread I go into. After awhile you have to accept the fact that the problem isnt everyone else, but you, yourself.

 

Ohhhhh!!! So aggression = sloppy!!!!

I get it now... You're a ****ing newbie.

Hit the bricks, kid. I don't need an elementary boxing analysis from a kid who won't even post his source or evidence.

You could have said "pac leaves him self open to be counter punched when he goes all out" or "pac is too aggressive" but you decided "pac is sloppy" which basically makes it seem like you're a god damn moron.

#1 p4p fighter in the sport is sloppy......

Right.
Got it Jason.