Mayweather beat a much better version of Hatton than Pacquaio did. FACT!

Hatton being heavier then Mayweather doesn't mean he beat a better version. Where the **** does that even come from? :huh

If anything, it goes against your claim, as Hatton has no business at WW. Glad to see you put thought into this...

 

You Floyd fans are a disease. I see obnoxious dickriding **** posted from you on here probably about 3 times more than I see from the *******s.

You guys whine and cry if someone disrespects Floyd and call them "HAteRZ", yet your on here trying to discredit everything Pacquiao has ever done with numerous threads a day. Just **** off for once.

Hatton was a good win for both. Floyd fought him when he was undefeated, adjusted in the fight and knocked him out in the 10th. Pac fought a Hatton who had been defeated and stretched him immediately. It is what it is. Good win for both.

 

it's like fighting Marquez at 144 :tired

 

troll reply..all smiley, no proper response....

 

You wouldn't agree that Hatton was weathered by the time he fought Pacquaio?

 

What does that mean anyway? :huh Can you even articulate a reply?

Maybe you haven't noticed, but Pac and JMM are much closer in size then Floyd and JMM. JMM looked bloated vs. Floyd. He looked to be better conditioned vs. Pac.

Either way, JMM shoudln't be at WW regardless of WHO he fights. He's matched up well for three fights. Is that a surprise?

Now, if you are as smart as you claim, explain how that is wrong. :deal

 

it was great. Turns out your mom isn't pregnant by me

 

way to miss the point. Marquez fought at 144 before and looked like crap. Pacquiao dragged him up and fought him there. The same thing you accuse Floyd of

 

This isn't about how Mayweather looked, it's about how Hatton looked.

And learn to ****in read and understand what you are reading. I have NEVER said Floyd only beat Hatton because it was at 147. Where the **** do ytou guys get this **** from? Floyd beats hatton at any weight.

But what you are claiming is, Floyd beat a better version, where as I stated, Hatton had no business at WW.

Is that clear enough? :huh

 

Actually, I never accused Floyd of that dip****. I merely stated hatton is better at his preferred weight of 140, rather then at 147.

Are you going to say that's not true now? that Hatton was better at WW then JrWW?

 

:good

AND

wasnt that the same hatton who got his ass kicked in his only other welterweight fight ? and if i remember correctly hatton said he wasnt a true welter (obviously) and dropped back down to 140.....
floyd is smart now....he saw how he got his ass beat but came away with that "0" and could give him his 2nd loss but be seen on paper taking his "0"
undefeated vs undefeated was a fraudulent title for that fight too

 

Look at the contradictions atsch

 

No Hatton is better at 140 than 147. But he's also better as an undefeated and undamaged fighter too numbnuts :hi:

 

Picking two single sentences out of a post, on different things don't make a contradiction.

Nice try though. But some fanatics will pop in to agree with you at least :thumbsup