Mayweather beat a much better version of Hatton than Pacquaio did. FACT!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxsensei, Mar 7, 2012.


  1. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Let not try and pretend Floyd beat the **** outta hatton dude. :patsch
     
  2. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    .

    I forgot you have no reading comphrehension, logic or common sense. You keep saying that Hatton had no business at WW, but you can't articulate any reasons as to why. What effect did him only having to to cut to 147 instead of 140 have on him? If you can' answer that then your dumbass point is defeated.
     
  3. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    On one post you say that Mayweather and Hatton being the same size doesn't matter since Hatton is the one having to come up in weight, but then you defend Paquiao for dragging Marquez up 2 weight divisions because they're the same size.
     
  4. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    :huh I really have to EXPLAIN to you why Hatton was better at JrWW? Seriously? Look Atlas, guys fit in at different weights better then others.

    If you honestly need more then that, you need to watch more boxing. I mean, for ****'s sake dude, you aren't stupid (I hope),m you can see with your own two eyes.
     
  5. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :patsch No dip****, I never said that. You're trying to piece together bits from one post and apply them to another.

    I never said Floyd and Hatton being the same size doesn't matter. I said Hatton was better at 140 then 147. And I never defended Pac for dragging up JMM to WW either. Learn the difference between talking about something and defending it.

    The comparison on this thread is Pac beating Hatton at 140, and Floyd beating Hatton at 147. Are you aware of that?
     
  6. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Also, Mayweather fought his last fight at before that at junior middle so expecting him to drop 2 divisions when he's the bigger draw is totally unrealistic.
     
  7. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    23
    Oct 27, 2010
    :rofl ok that's enough
     
  8. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    Hatton ruled jr. WW because he was bigger and stronger than his opponents and could maul them. He was bigger than Floyd as well. But he couldn't match up skill wise, hence he lost. The bottom line is that fact that the fight was at 147 had nothing to do with why Hatton lost. it was because he was in with better opponent.

    You keep trying to say that Hatton was better at 140 than 147, but you have nothing to substantiate that. At 147, he fought a slick southpaw who he beat, and then the number 1 p4p fighter in the world. Thats why he didn't look good. It wasn't the damn weight class it was who he fought.
     
  9. Rudyard

    Rudyard **** How You Feel!! HOE! banned

    27,672
    1
    Jan 30, 2009
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but didnt Hatton turn down a fight with May at 140??

    Its very unlikey that May is gonna drop weight when he gave Hatton a chance at 140...You cant reason with some bitchass dudes sometimes!:-(
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004

    :patsch No one is saying Floyd needed to drop down in this thread. It's about WHO beat the better version of Hatton.

    You ****s argue **** that NO ONE is even saying...:roll:
     
  11. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Bigger then floyd? How, because he weighed a little more? :huh
    And for ****'s sakre.. I did not say he beat Hatton BECAUSE it was at 147. Are you even reading?

    Again, that is common knowledge. Just as SSM is better at 147 then 154. Just as Floyd is better at 147 then 154. Or DLH being better at 154 then 160. :patsch
     
  12. canucks9314

    canucks9314 Iron Chinned ATG Warrior Full Member

    11,933
    10
    Jun 21, 2011
    Pacquiao fought a shot, cokeheaded, emo version of Hatton. Mayweather fought him in his prime while he still had all his confidence.
     
  13. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Some of you are trying to argue points that NO ONE is making...
     
  14. boxsensei

    boxsensei Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,708
    82
    Oct 19, 2008
    Yes, he weighed more therefore he was bigger.
     
  15. Stinky gloves

    Stinky gloves Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,255
    14
    May 31, 2007
    that could be said in different way:

    Now I''m not saying that Judah having issues were Mayweather's fault. It looked to be a good fight on paper. But ultimately, Floyd fought, an emaciated, coked up, depressed, poorly trained, shell of his formerself Judah who wasn't nearly as good as the one Baldomir fought. A guy who got busted up by Carlos Baldomir. A guy who was ruined. Another overrated win in the legacy of Floyd Mayweather.

    ... or

    Now I''m saying that Marquez having issues were Mayweather's fault. It looked to be a good fight on paper. But ultimately, Floyd fought, a blown up, fat, slow, over trained, shell of his formerself Marquez who wasn't nearly as good as the one PAC fought. A guy who was untested at 140lb. A guy who was cheated on the scale. Another overrated win in the legacy of Floyd Mayweather.