mayweather best of his era if not than who is?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by money21207, Jun 18, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. money21207

    money21207 knockout artist Full Member

    495
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    imo he beats pac everybody is over hyped up over pac, I like him and think he's a great fighter but it says a lot that everyone was calling the marquez fight a walk in the park for mayweather but he pushed pac to the limit not once but twice. everyone still thinks it would be a great fight to see pac marquez3 but mayweather marquez is just mayweather being a wuss and cherry picking but pac gets all the praise for fighting the same guys that mayweather was scrutinized for even taking those fights
     
    money21207, Jun 18, 2009
    money21207, Jun 18, 2009
    #1
  2. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    Pac is the best of his era.
     
    bladerunner, Jun 18, 2009
    bladerunner, Jun 18, 2009
    #2
  3. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    GTFO noob...:****off
     
    tolindoy, Jun 18, 2009
    tolindoy, Jun 18, 2009
    #3
  4. hmm

    hmm damn chairs Full Member

    4,992
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    hmm says... same thing different poster.
     
    hmm, Jun 18, 2009
    hmm, Jun 18, 2009
    #4
  5. viperguy

    viperguy Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,627
    0
    Jan 21, 2005
    Pacisdabest
    Mayrunnerup
     
    viperguy, Jun 18, 2009
    viperguy, Jun 18, 2009
    #5
  6. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    135 vs 147....PAC faught a PRIME JMM at 130 and 135. JMM is going to fight Floyd at 147. A BIG difference especially since JMM hasn't even faught above 135 and he's 37. His last two fights although exciting...VERY exciting were against Casa who was obviously on the slide and Diaz who was a very good fighter but very limited. No one can question that if JMM was prime and at his best he wouldn't have struggled with either man. He did....but as a champion he did what he had to do.
     
    charlievint, Jun 18, 2009
    charlievint, Jun 18, 2009
    #6
  7. money21207

    money21207 knockout artist Full Member

    495
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    last I checked dolin you jus joined in january I've been on here for years now just created an account im not biased or anything im a fan of pac but mayweather is discredited because of his his personality not what he does in the ring oh and your an idiot man
     
    money21207, Jun 18, 2009
    money21207, Jun 18, 2009
    #7
  8. mgdb26

    mgdb26 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,352
    4
    May 11, 2009

    Mayweather is discredited because he doesn't fight the best fighters out there in his division, Pac on the other hand not only fights all the best fighters in his division he fights the best fighters in higher divisions. Don't get me wrong, I think Mayweather is a better fighter but he can't call himself the best if he doesn't face the best.
     
    mgdb26, Jun 18, 2009
    mgdb26, Jun 18, 2009
    #8
  9. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    just a wild guess. pacman?
     
    dhenzrae, Jun 18, 2009
    dhenzrae, Jun 18, 2009
    #9
  10. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Pac is better than Floyd, Floyd gets overrated because he runs his mouth so much.
     
    PH|LLA, Jun 18, 2009
    PH|LLA, Jun 18, 2009
    #10
  11. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    i would actually say floyd, because imo he is the most polished overall best boxer of his era....

    resume wise for the era you would have to go with manny p
     
    Jeff Young, Jun 18, 2009
    Jeff Young, Jun 18, 2009
    #11
  12. p4p_kid

    p4p_kid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,022
    1
    Dec 8, 2008
    have you ever heard of the phrase "styles makes fights"?

    mayweather will just wait for marquez and marquez will do the same either...while pac will fight every minute of every round.
     
    p4p_kid, Jun 18, 2009
    p4p_kid, Jun 18, 2009
    #12
  13. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Hopkins is even more polished than Mayweather and has done more with less physical gifts.
     
    PH|LLA, Jun 18, 2009
    PH|LLA, Jun 18, 2009
    #13
  14. money21207

    money21207 knockout artist Full Member

    495
    0
    Jun 17, 2009
    lol how can u say he's over rated he hasn't lost a fight 39-0 I look forward to seeing that fight though just to see all the excuses made for pac. mayweather better fighter, pac more exciting and better resume for sure
     
    money21207, Jun 18, 2009
    money21207, Jun 18, 2009
    #14
  15. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    well hopkins imo is underrated on this list of "best fighters of the era" when i see them.....but hopkins of the last 5-6 years hasnt been that flashy to say the least, hit and hug, and wrestle imo.....prime hopkins yes was maybe more polished then floyd....but floyd wasnt really prime yet himself at that time......does hopkins' resume **** all over floyd's? absolutely
     
    Jeff Young, Jun 18, 2009
    Jeff Young, Jun 18, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3