Mayweather & Current Legacy

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by zivic1941, Dec 5, 2007.


  1. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    Mayweather is a terrific fighter, but almost any modern day fighter is going to come up short in the thickness of resume department compared to fighters in the past like Robinson and Armstrong who fought so much more often.

    What I would like to do is compare Mayweather to the other top fighters in recent years, among this era. Mayweather's opposition level, while solid, could've been better in the last few years. He's got to do more before establishing himself as the best of this era, rather than being one of the top ones. The p4p thing, not beating too many top 10 guys, well, I don't really hold that against him. Going by The Ring's top 10 p4p lists, DLH only beat one top 10 p4p guy, and that was a controversial decision over Whitaker. Tito only beat one, and that was controversial (Oscar). Mayweather has beaten one and maybe will have two on Saturday. As for Hatton moving up, well, Hatton did more are 147 (winning close decision over top 5 WW after moving up on short notice) than guys like say, Nelson @ 135 or Chavez @ 147. Sure, Hatton isn't an ATG like those two, but he also will likely enter the ring on Saturday as the heavier man, which I doubt Nelson and Chavez were over Whitaker. Oscar made a whole habit out of having guys move up to face him...this is Floyd's 2nd time doing so.
     
  2. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    712
    May 22, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  3. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    Quartey was a top 10 P4P fighter, the bottom half.
     
  4. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    41,963
    3,442
    Jun 30, 2005
    In reality, he probably was deserving (in terms of skills/talent/ability).

    But I'm talking about the official p4p lists from The Ring.

    Personally I think way too much is made out of this mythical stuff.
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    1. So What? Mayweather put a chalenge down when he was at 135 'anyone up to 147' and he moved to 154 to egt delahoya.

    2. Yes and Mayweather peaked at 130, hes now at 147 - thats like Duran at 154. Mayweather is far more dominant at 147 than Duran was at 154. Remember Duran got whooped by Hearns, Benitez and Laing at 154

    3. Leonard fought the best but he missed many of the elite top fighters and avoided the Hearns rematch, Pryor and so on......

    4. Overall SRR and Armstrong ducked the black dynamite crew. How many top10 P4P fighters did SRR and Armstrong face off with? Well they didn't fight Charles, Burley, Moore etc etc

    5. Who says Delahoya was further past his prime against PBF than Whitaker was against Delahoya? Delahoya had 1 of his best career performances 10 months earlier so thats not the best argument. If you're going to take Sturn away from Delahoya do you give him Mosley 2?

    6. NO NO NO Delahoya fought Carr instead of Quartey. Quartey easily won 9 rounds against Delahoya EASILY. Remember when Mayweather had a similar time when he had a close fight with Castillo? Did he duck Castillo or rematch him?

    7. Yes and against the best Trinidad got whooped. Who did Trinidad ever beat who was P4P excluding the Delahoya gift?

    8. Mosley has excellent comp but hes lost 5 times since 2002.

    I don't hold this career management against these fighters that much but the double standards and rose tinted glasses need to be shown up for what they are
     
  6. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    1. Which P4P fighter did you want him to face since 2002?????? Tyszu - unavailable. Hatton - turned him down. Cotto-turned him down and only recently P4P. Spinks - lost, Judah - lost and beat him There was no P4P fighters from 140-147 other than Floyd and Hatton and Hatton kept turning him down

    1a) How many P4P fighters did SRR and Armstrong face?

    1b) We can agree Burley was a legend.

    3) If you were PBF in 2005 and Hatton and Cotto had turned you down at 140 and you had the P4P Judah at 147, isnt P4P Judah the best fight to make? Its not Mayweathers fault Judah underestimated Baldomir and lost.

    I think your being unfair underestimating the Judah win. Judah showed his best against Mayweather and did pretty well early on.

    4) I think your looking at 2002-2005 too much when there were no big fights to make. 2006 and 2007 have been excellent comp Judah, Baldomir, Delahoya, Hatton. 4 Linear Champs back to back.

    5) Well yes but Hatton-Mayweather is historical because they were 1 and 2 at 140lbs. Hatton is bigger than Mayweather, its testiment that to Mayweather he has beaten the top 147 and 154lbers while essentially been smaller than many lightweights.

    I actually think a well prepared Hatton is a serious danger to Floyd. Then again as a PBF fan I was worried about the problems Mitchell, Judah and DLH would present. (No I wasn't worried about Baldomir stylistically but Baldomir is very underrated)

    6. Hatton's father stated they had turned down Mayweathers talks of the fights 5 times from 2004-2006. Mayweather wanted his first fight at 140 to be Hatton instead of Corley, he wanted Hatton in November 2005 instead of Mitchell, he wanted Hatton to fill in for Judah when Judah lost in 2006.

    It wouldnt have been a big fight back in 2004 but it may have happened.

    This is public knowledge I don't need to show press releases but start a thread on the general forum asking about it and you'll get the info.

    Arrum himself said Cotto wasn't ready for PBF at 140 - again this is public knowledge. I'm nto going diggin for the articles but its there if you want to find it
     
  7. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mayweather and Hatton both offered fights to Tyszu, Tyszu took the bigger money from Hatton, the rest is history

    Are you claiming Mayweather is would make the same mistakes as Judah and Mitchell against Tyszu?
     
  8. Minotauro

    Minotauro Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,628
    712
    May 22, 2007
    This content is protected
     
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    4. Yes I always get the black dynamite and the the black murders row mixed up. I think I'll start calling them both the ducked black murderers dynamite row

    1. I wasn't being completely Anti-Armstrong I was trying to demonstrate that Mayweather may not have fought all the best fighters around his weight but most fighters in history didnt including SRR and Armstrong.

    I also think that Armstrong despite being an excellent fighters gets a little overrated at welterweight as his comp wasn't devastating.

    2. How do Delahoya, Hatton, Judah, Castillo, Corrales, Genaro Hernadez, Chavez, Gatti compare to Ambers, Ross, Zivic, Sarron or the like of Gavilan, LaMotta, Basilio, Fullmer, Turpin & Graziano??????? Is there that many degrees of seperation?

    3. Yes Tyszu was very good but I think a 170lb Delahoya with his skills and defense was a tougher fight than a 35yo Tyszu - agree or disagree? Delahoya ko'd some joint opponents quicker
     
  10. dmt

    dmt Hardest hitting hw ever Full Member

    11,380
    17,191
    Jul 2, 2006
    no offense but this is not true. Armstrong made 19 title defenses at welterweight. Besides If Pretty boy was fighting 30 times a year then he could lose to Zivc or Ambers (do u know what a dirty player Zivic was)
     
  11. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    Most think he beat Tito though. And I'd definitely say Tito is a better welterweight (and fighter per se) than Ricky Hatton.


    It's one thing moving up and facing Luis Collazo and its another thing moving up and facing Pernell Whtiaker. What if Hatton had to move up and face Pernell Whitaker? We can almost say with certainty he would have been moving back down to 140 with his tail between his legs. And probably in more embarassing fashion than Nelson or Chavez did to their respective divisions.
     
  12. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Most of Armstrong defenses were journeymen, so while 20 defenses sounds impressive its not 20 quality fights, most of them were easy pickings.
     
  13. zivic1941

    zivic1941 Member Full Member

    178
    4
    Jul 21, 2004
    1. Right at the top of 130 pounders in boxing history.

    2. In my opinion, split fights with Castillo at lightweight, with a few other defenses.

    3. Won a belt at 140, defended a few times.

    4. Has done more at 147 than 140. Beating Baldomir (who reminds me of Armando Muniz), now defending against the best 140 pounder. Fought a close decision against Oscar at 154, albeit one can make the argument that Oscar was 3-3 going into that fight (actually lost to Sturm).

    Here's the issue, and it's pretty simple. If you and your camp are talking about being one of the greatest---if not the greatest---fighter ever, back it up with unification. Part of the reason boxing has suffered is because casual fans can't name champs. Too much fragmentation. Floyd has been a culprit along those lines for a while.

    Calzaghe and Kessler unified at 168.

    We know that Hopkins is really considered the top dog at 175 after acing Tarver.

    We all consider Kelly Pavlik the man at 160.

    154 is an open book. Remember, DLH won that belt from Mayorga before losing the close decision to Mayweather. At 154 as well, Vernon Forrest, past his prime and prone to injuries in the last several years, was more impressive against Baldomir at that weight than Mayweather was at 147.

    Pac, Marquez, Barrera, and Morales never had trouble signing on the dotted line against each other.

    Wherever Mayweather seems to go, we don't have the clarity we have in other divisions.

    147 is a hot weight class. Be a champ, ask for a tournament. In 2001, King put together the middleweight tournament, and the fighters and promoters should ask for the same. After Cintron heals, and if Mayweather wins tonight, put it together. Cintron and Williams were already moving in that direction anyways.

    In early summer/late spring, do this.

    1) Match Mayweather with Williams.
    2) Match Cotto with Cintron. If Cintron is still injured, substitute with Margarito---Arum had been talking about Margarito - Cotto anyways this past year---and put a contractual stipulation in place which guarantees Cintron an automatic #1 contender place when the tournament finalizes.

    In the late Fall, the winners meet and unify. As stated, Cintron meets the winner of the tournament in the Spring of 2009.

    Personally, I don't think Mayweather would make it to the finals (Williams is a very hard styles match-up), and I doubt you'll hear him call out the other champs tonight. It would be refreshing if he would, because we haven't seen him fighting the best available guys for quite a while. Let's face it, Hatton---a good, tough, game fighter---might've actually lost to Collazo. Collazo won maybe 1 or 2 rounds against Mosley.

    It's one of the reasons Emanuel Steward calls Mayweather a "very good" fighter, but not a great fighter like those Mayweather likes to mention himself along with.

    I agree with that sentiment. I like watching Mayweather fight. He has perfect balance. Superb technician. Always in shape. But.....he's one of those guys that leaves you with the feeling that he's not going to dig, dig, dig to make sure he puts himself over the top completely.

    As a micro way of looking at this, when Oscar pounded away in the corners against him, he slipped, and then HELD....and moved to the center of the ring....and continued to slip in reverse gear instead of firing myriad combinations to turn the tide of the bout and make it a dominant win. Always does that. Why not do what Sugar Ray Leonard, James Toney, Sugar Ray Robinson, and so many other have done.....go ahead and slip....and then nail the guy with your own to close the level of doubt. SAFETY FIRST.

    I'll be back to answer some more of this thread later today.
     
  14. zivic1941

    zivic1941 Member Full Member

    178
    4
    Jul 21, 2004
    The more you fight, you more you are risking a chance to lose. True statement.

    Fritzie Zivic is in the Hall of Fame. He lost 65 TIMES. Why is he in the Hall of Fame? All you have to do is listen to the quotes of Robinson and LaMotta. Robinson said Zivic was his toughest opponent, and LaMotta said Zivic was his smartest opponent. Look at the combined resumes of those fighters, and their place in boxing history.

    In the end, it's about putting it all on the line.
     
  15. zivic1941

    zivic1941 Member Full Member

    178
    4
    Jul 21, 2004
    7-5 fight for Oscar, and put completely over the top with the last round knockdown and near stoppage.