Mayweather-Guerrero for Ring Title

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PBFred, Mar 6, 2013.


  1. Nonito Smoak

    Nonito Smoak Ioka>Lomo, sorry my dudes Full Member

    53,084
    6,686
    Sep 8, 2010
    Even under The Rings' rules before the rule change almost a year ago, this fight would have been for the vacant WW lineal title.
     
  2. AZ_40

    AZ_40 Active Member Full Member

    1,008
    2
    Oct 15, 2011
    cool mayweather should have it anyways
     
  3. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,673
    24,885
    Feb 19, 2007
    if jmm, who i think is a harder fight than guerrero at this point, doesnt want to challenge for top spot, then i have no problem with floyd and guerrero establishing top spot.
     
  4. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,740
    89
    Jan 14, 2011
    Not necessarily. They would only allow 1-3 match-ups be for the belt on select occasions. Bradley-Alexander and Mosley-Margarito for instance were not for The Ring belt prior to the dumb rule changes. And of course, it's just as problematic to even have Guerrero as high as 3 anyway.
     
  5. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    58,829
    14,063
    Jul 28, 2009
    Yeah, there are plenty of times when 1+2 is simply not sensible. There's too much clinging to that. But, along that line, I think it should be clearly stated that if number two (or number one contender if not vacant) doesn't want it and they do this, they should just downgrade the man that doesn't want it and it will become one and two.