Mayweather has no reason to fight the winner of Mosley/Cotto

What the **** did you just say?

 

Apparently you don't count men... Sounds pretty strange to me. Why on earth would anyone want to "count men" for. Maybe its his was of working out the odds of finding another lover.

 

I never said their styles were similar now did I? And clearly I am not the only one who thinks that PBF would simply box and move against Cotto and win just like he did Castillo. Don't read so much into what people say.

All I said is that people think that Castillo layed a blueprint to beat PBF (Pressure). And PBF adjusted to that style of fighting and beat him in the 2nd one. I never said that Cotto and Castillo fight alike. I was only saying that people think that Cotto applying pressure will help him beat PBF like it helped Castillo keep it close. PBF adjusted in the 2nd fight, and that counts for something.

 

see, thats exactly why he has to fight the winner of mosley/cotto since the hatton fight is absolutely ridiculous. everyone and their mama know floyd would beat the smaller overhyped hatton. theres no point of fighting hatton for mayweather because he's not much of a threat and its not going to prove ****. If he wants to further cement his legacy he should go against mosley or cotto, or even williams. but nah, your boy had to take the easiest fight available. goes to prove how much of a "warrior" mayweather is and how he didn't duck anyone.

 

OK! :good

 

so hatton is not a ring champ, or does being a ring champ mean nothing nowadays

 

ring champ at jw, not ww. and this fight is happening at ww and there are lots of better options at ww, why just hatton?

 

You assessment of Cotto being better at cutting off the ring is absolutely correct btw. Not sure how well that would work on PBF, but it would be interesting to see. Mosley won't need the ring cut off on him though, so this will be no indication.

 

You are right on with Mosley, btw I don't know if Cotto cutting the ring better will help him either

 

what do you mean why hatton? you were probably one of the people accusing floyd of ducking hatton at 140. this is unfinished business and if you haven't been following floyd's or hatton's career then you wouldn't understand what I just typed.

 

Well, he could at least make for for lost time in which he fought guys like Phillip N'dou, a faded Mitchell and Judah, a mismatched Gatti and Henry Bruseles among others, by fighting guys who seems to possess legit threats to beat him.

 

Floyd doesnt need to prove a damn thing!!! So say the groupies

Guess what??? When you talk that ATG, "best ever" type talk??


YOU DAMN SURE NEED TO BACK IT UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Floyd hasnt done it yet, and if he retires after Hatton?? He still hasnt!!!
Floyd needs to make his career statement at 147 and UNIFY/BEAT THE CHAMPIONS!!! You dont get credit for conjecture and specualtion:nono You get credit for results!!!

BTW, SSM, Cotto, and Williams would be the best opposition Floyd will have faced:yep Honestly?? All 3 have a chance of beating Floyd and thats what makes THOSE VICTORIES WORTHY AND OF LEGACY MERIT.

Let Floyd dod what the greats have done, lay it down, and leave the legacy of proof. Not hide behind a cherry picked, shiny, 0, with too many things left untested.

I cant stand floyd the man, but I'll respect Floyd the Champion WHEN HE PROVES HIS GREATNESS and not UNTIL!!!

BTW, Hatton was definitely one of the opponents floyd should be facing. It should have been at 40, but hey at least its happeneing. Step 1 in legitimizing his career.