Mayweather has reached the age where a loss may not effect his place in history

Wasn't RJJ 35 when he got knocked out by Tarver?

 

:thumbsup

 

Morales was 29 when Pac knocked him out.

 

I thought losing doesn't affect anyone's legacy on ESB? What happen to all them little bitches that credit you simply just for having names on your resume?

 

Are you ****ing kidding me?, Floyd beats almost everyone with ease from the last 10+ years according to most people on here, including a Middleweight Martinez... whilst Manny is now virtually even money with Tim Bradley coming up from 140.

That may have been true 2 or 3 years ago, but it's the exact opposite now... especially after the whole Marquez debacle.

 

:hi:

 

Hey Leon.

 

well you know, Cotto is an atg for losing to Margarito and Pacquiao

 

Hah nice one... I figured that was mentioned but didn't feel like going through 12 pages to confirm :good

 

What kind of drugs are you on?

 

I would say only ODLH up at at lmw at the time he fought him, but who has Pac fought according to you? Im not one of those *****s who don't listen to logic but im just saying every fighter's record can be looked at and criticized

 

no prob pimpin :rasta

 

Mayweather's place in history has already been determined by the fights he DIDN'T have, and you're right. It's too late to change that.

 

Floyd is already a consensus top 50 ATG...as he continues to win and beat the highest ranked opponents out there, his status will only go up.

 

what about Pac's 3 losses? does it affect his place in history?