Mayweather has to come back

are you serious?

 

Mayweather will be back.

He is waiting until after Hatton and Hoya fights, to see what happens. He will fight the winner of either.

 

Nah,ne need of him.

 

i have to admit, i miss pbf, he was the benchmark

 

Yes, I'm serious.



He DOMINATED p4p Diego Corrales who was 33-0 w/ 28 KOs at the time.

He destroyed Angel Manfredy, Demarcus Corley, Arturo Gatti, Zab Judah, and Carlos Baldomir.

He beat JLC 2x.

He came up to 154 and beat Oscar.

He DESTROYED Ricky Haton (unbeaten fighter who was expected by many to provide Floyd is toughest test...)



If an undefeated Floyd Mayweather comes back and beats 2-3 top 5 p4p guys...Ex. Manny Pacquiao (if he beats oscar) & Margarito (if he beats mosley/clottey/williams and cotto in rematch).


And by beat I mean dominate the way he did to Corrales and Hatton...Yes, he's top 5 p4p in my book.

 

You're a douchebag.

 

I'm one of floyd bigest fans but come on top 5 for beating a slow fighter who throws wide shots with little accuracy and has no defence and pac who is tailor made for floyd and smaller as well.

If he beats cotto, williams, pacquiao, margarito and berto he would go top 15 for me possibly top 10 but even that i doubt. To hit top 5 he needs to beat someone like pavlik

 

I'm really tired of Floyd Mayweathers fans claiming boxing is dead now that Floyd left, and that boxing is in such need of "MONEY!".

Give me a ****ing break.

 

I'm a douchebag because my opinion differ than yours?

 

I really don't give a **** if he ever fights again or not:-( there plenty of good exciting young guy's on the way up to watch, Berto, Williams,Chad Dawson, even Kelly Pavlik, why do people keep bringing up Mayweather??? it's not like he was a very exciting fighter, and he was an ******* outside the ring

 

Personally, I consider factors like talent, domination, weight class changes etc.

 

You're a douchebag because you disrespect the sport by saying that on two fights alone, Floyd ranks in the top5 ATG.

You're disrespecting the sport, and that makes you a douchebag.

 

So do i, i have him higher than most on this forum at the moment (around 25 ish i think he would be though haven't got a list after the top 10). I just can't see what difference wins over margo and pac really make to floyd resume to have him ranked above robinson, armstrong, langford, greb, duran, charles, leonard etc.

To rank top 5 of all time in my opinion you need to either have an unbelivable packed resume (robinson, charles, greb) full of great fighters, or have remarkable achievments like armstrong holding 3 weight class titles at the same time or duran being a natural lightweight that beat top 3 all time welter and won a title at middle.

Floyd is great but he has never done anything close to that and all of them fighters in there own way where as skilled as floyd. Again IMO to hit top 5 you need to do something extraordinary like beating pavlik for instance

 

boxing needs mayweather he was a great entertainer,o.k. he never stood toe2toe with anyone but his skill was second 2 none. he got people talking about boxing again, he brought boxing back into the mainstream,is there any figther out there at the moment besides DLH? I dont think so

 

boxing needs mayweather he was a great entertainer,o.k. he never stood toe2toe with anyone but his skill was second 2 none. he got people talking about boxing again, he brought boxing back into the mainstream,is there any figther out there at the moment besides DLH? I dont think so.