Mayweather is a disgrace to the sport & has not chased history like the Sugar Rays...

I didn't make anything up, it was announced that pacquiao agreed to the terms; and Mayweather didn't say anything. This did come from Bob's mouth, but Floyd isn't much credible either.

 

Why would they dispute it? Plus, there was a gag order in effect

edit: here you go

Dispute:
1. To argue about; debate.
2. To question the truth or validity of; doubt

 

What terms did he agree too? Where is it in writing? You arent that dumb are you?

 

Mosley doesnt slur and he was coming off a decisive victory over the Welterweight champ.

Floyds a 5 division champ. 6 time champion and is 15-0 against current or former world champions.

To this day Corrales is still a better victory. So was DLH.


I mean the fact he never lost. Wow. Pacquiao has gotten his ass kicked what, 5 times? Counting the Marquez draw and dubious victory aswell? Mayweahter always comes out on top. :bbb

 

You lose :yep

 

Hmm, well I'm not Pacquiao or Mayweather... so I'm not quite sure how ANYONE is going to be able to present this to you. atsch

 

Nope. Im like Morales in the 1st fight vs Pacquiao. I just went southpaw on your boy and still whipped his ass.

 

If it was true that Pacquiao agreed to terms, dont you think Arum would have it in writing? You are the one who made the stupid claim in the first place kid. Repeating a lie as fact makes you a liar aswell.

 

Yes, on a little thing called a CONTRACT.

 

Yeah he is losing the debate with dingbat but at least he comes up with reasons defending Floyd, and you? Is that what you got? :smoke

 

Horrible reasons, the guy is asking for a contract lol

 

what reasons??? like you, he is Floydelusional :rofl