mayweather is overated you got to be kidding i think hes underated most people have him maybe top 30 atg i have him top 5
what sugests hes not people love to rank boxers from the dawm of time over floyd, i bet in 20 years most people will have him at least top10.
I dont want to judge Mayweather because he accomplish some great things , but i still got a sour taste in my mouth (i dont talk about my girlfriend there) about is legacy. as an fan of boxing i dont like to see a phenom like him sit at home without fighting when he could give us so much entertaining fights. i dont really like Floyd from his shittalking but you need to respect the boxer ! I will appreciate if PBF comeback and answer the question he left when he decided to retire.
I'm bumping this in the hope that BigReg will respond to it. I'd like to hear from the intelligent side of the pro-Floyd-ATG camp. (I personally believe only the top 50 fighters of history deserve the title "ALL-TIME GREAT". I had Mayweather around 35th-ish when I did my own p4p top 100, but as I said at the start of the above post, I am re-evaluating just now for all of the reasons stated above. Is Mayweather a top 50 OAT, an ATG, or have I overrated him by giving him that placing? This is the question the above post is trying to address)
39-0 is a good record but its not enough fights to be considered an ATG let alone the best ever, its a shame the whole promotion game has stopped fighters fighting 10 to 12 fights a year
I dont care if you came and got a fighter with 0 pro fights and he came and beat 5 ATG's that were in their prime and then retired, he who only has 5 fights is an ATG. and besides, PBF was an ATG when he was only 24
floyd's elusiveness and counters (where some of boxing fans called it running) makes him excting for me imo =D