Mayweather may hit harder than Pacman @ 147

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, May 7, 2010.


  1. MiddleHook

    MiddleHook New Member Full Member

    24
    0
    May 5, 2010
    At the lower weights, he did have one-shot KO power. Fahsan 3K or Sasakul will tell you such.
     
  2. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    True.....but at WW??? He's a decent size Jr WW at best but he's capable of competing and beating larger men due to his dynamic attributes.
     
  3. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,103
    10,519
    Jul 28, 2009
    Mayweather, Cuevas...Hearns...Obvious.
     
  4. Round1gymDC

    Round1gymDC Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,788
    3
    Dec 12, 2009
    Now this is a good discussion, people thinking outside of th box, this is like an impossible math equation that may have two different answers. We might have to wait until to the fight before we know his outcome I just didn't want people to assume Pac would be the harder puncher just for the **** of it


    My next post will be about " what the does the Mosley v Mayweather fight say about Marquez?
     
  5. splatter69

    splatter69 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,727
    1,328
    Aug 4, 2007
    Opps, My bad.

    here lemmie step on his tail while you hit him to the body....
     
  6. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    wow thats surprising seen as you dont know **** about boxing.
     
  7. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008

    Hatton was able to get up from the knockdown that your referring to which came 9 or 10 rounds into the fight where as Pac flattened Hatton in round 2 with a punch that the ref could have counted to 10 mins.

    It really isn't debatable that Pac has the punching power advantage, (when objective reasoning is applied.)
     
  8. Edward

    Edward Active Member Full Member

    698
    1
    Oct 28, 2009
    This is some crazy logic

    Pacman is faster (which equals power), but Floyd has power (which must equal speed), accuracy and speed (which equals power) which trumps Pacmans power (which equals speed).

    I'm sorry... what?
     
  9. Edward

    Edward Active Member Full Member

    698
    1
    Oct 28, 2009
    Does your 'objective reasoning' factor in that the two incidents you are comparing are at different weights? Objective reasoning could lead one to believe that Hatton could have had better punch resistance at 147.

    Anyone who actually applies 'objective reasoning' will clearly conclude that we cannot determine the answer to this, leaving us to speculate, or if you like 'debate'.
     
  10. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    Damn good post Bro:good
     
  11. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008

    Are you arguing a technicality, semantics, or the notion that FMJ could just actually have an advantage in the puncher power department?
     
  12. Beckjl

    Beckjl Member Full Member

    422
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Mayweather hits harder at 147, as someone already mentioned before, Pac hits people with punches they don't see coming....thats different than hitting harder.
     
  13. Edward

    Edward Active Member Full Member

    698
    1
    Oct 28, 2009
    None of the above, I'm simply pointing out that none of us are in a position to conclude either way with any real conviction, 'objective reasoning' doesn't come into it.

    The point extremely debatable, indeed all we can do is debate based on our own assumptions and speculation.
     
  14. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008

    Personally, I've concluded with conviction, based on the given information, that Pac has in fact more punching power than FMJ, at 147. Although an exact scientific measurement is lacking in this caparison, there is by far and away enough circumstantial evidence to support the theory, imo.
     
  15. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uOfUhf3kMMo[/ame]