Mayweather: "Mosley has trouble with boxers ..."

Mosley wasn't burdoned by Cottos boxing skill. He was burdoned by the risk of getting exposed by cotto power.

Near the end when he realized he overrated Cottos power and then began to be more active and eventually flourished at the end.

Lucky cotto was smart enough to see this and back off and take the easy win.

 

Indeed mate, Cotto got mad props for that win.It wasn't a dominating performance he was lucky Shane had one of those so so night. We know Shane is alot better than that and I believe given a rematch SHANE would STOP COTTO.

:good

 

Mayweather has trouble with money.

 

that is very true statement, mosley has problems with the slick boxers.i think its better to out box mosley then to try and out fight him.the only boxers to every beat shane were boxers who could box there ass off.the first fight shane had with oscar he thought shane would be to little coming from 35 having one fight at 47 before fighting oscar.well when oscar seen how strong he was then he knew he ould not out fight him.in the rematch oscar took a boxing approach and kept a jab in mosley face and loss a very close decsion.

cotto damn near bout to pass out wass able to out box shane for the last 3 rds of there fight to win a close decsion, cotto was hurt and was still able to to out box shane for the last 3rds.so its **** like that that makes me think mayweather can and will outbox shane.

its time to see if a great lil man boxer and beat a great bigger man boxer, like then or hate them old or not they are both great boxers.but the point is mayweather is right about shane in boxers and if you follow the sport then you know that very accurate statment.

 

This content is protected

 

if it aint who he fights then its how he fights :-(
born hater and will die a hater, so sad :-(

 

As I mentioned in other threads, Floyd does a great job of talking down his opposition. Why not say "Shane beat some of the best guys out there, I anticipate a tough fight"

 

When you devote your time responding to negative Floyd posts, I don't think you can say anything like that:yep

 

I am just baiting the Floydettes, because they have the uncanny third sense of knowing that someone posted a sarcasm or negative thread regarding their idol.

I am just wondering if ESB is conniving with the Floydettes by putting up an alarm or filter that when someone post something about Money, Floydettes will be notified to put up their defense.

 

how so, you dont seem me hating on anyone.i just call a spade a spade, everytime i see one.if it seems like im doing it alot must be alot of hate going on.what you thinkn.

look like duck, quack like a duck, guess what ? its chicken

 

**** cant me in, i need a clan to take out all the mayweather haters.if you got some dumb **** to say then you know damn well i do.somebody got to keep it 100 on this site.that just the wait it is, you wake up feeling the need to hate, i wake up feeling the need to call out hater.
when does it end, well as long as you wake up everyday it dont end.just the way it is.i did not make the rules but i can play the game.

 

I wish I could make your life simplier but unfortunately your idol is not making it easy for Floydettes to defend him. The good side of it, you will become very good in making valid arguments and debate properly based on substance - hopefully. Nallege, Rooney and Ssdsfinest however are beyond redemption.

Better yet :

Koki Kameda

 

And? So? Last time I checked that was perfectly legal and that's the name of the game, hit and not get hit.

 

However, there is an element of truth to his post.

 

Floyd would never beat Winky at 154. Winky would have easily shutout the Oscar that Floyd fought a close fight with at 154