Mayweather-Mosley is a Non-Title Fight, Says Schaefer

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rapid, Apr 20, 2010.


  1. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    PPv numbers is definetely the deciding factor, but bringing a title belt is far from being "****" especially when bringing it against another belt. Apart from team pac agreeing to a 50/50 split maybe they felt that perhaps Floyd is a tad bigger cash cow than Pac but bringing a title to the table evens it out for 50/50. While banking on just PPV's for mosely/mayweather anything between 800,000 - 1.2 million will just cause another stalemate and leave us back where we were in January.
     
  2. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    He'd still have the leverage either way........"I beat the WBA champ and spat at the belt!"




    In Mayweather's case there are two reasons to not want that WBA belt......The sanctioning fees he would have to pay for owning it........and the other is that he would'nt have to worry about the WBA telling him who he has to fight.

    Good move in this case by Mayweather because he has nothing to gain by owning that belt........having it lessens his purse for this fight and future fights.

    When you're the best, and most people know it, you dont need a belt.
     
  3. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Believe me when I tell you that belt means nothing in terms of a Mayweather/Pacquiao fight. If the belt was so important, Floyd wouldn't be getting the much bigger cut against Mosley, and he wouldn't have been able to negotiate a rematch clause. Money decideds how negotiations go. Mayweather's earning power, as well as Pacquiao's, has zero to do with belts at this point in their careers.
     
  4. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    0
    Dec 23, 2007
    I don't think he cares about belts at this stage of his career. He's already won so many. He needs no added leverage in the negotiations with Pac. He's the biggest draw in boxing.
     
  5. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    0
    Dec 23, 2007
    Got there before me.
     
  6. BrooklynMumin

    BrooklynMumin HOPKINS A " G " Full Member

    6,797
    4
    Aug 17, 2008
  7. DoubleM

    DoubleM Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,395
    371
    Nov 20, 2009
    belts collect nothing but dusts.
     
  8. RJD

    RJD Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    0
    Dec 23, 2007
    Do you honestly believe that Pac would concede lets say 5% because Floyd has the WBA belt? Cotto's WBO belt didn't help him much in the negotiations. Pac got the lionshare of the pot (as he should of) and he also got to fight at a catchweight of 145lbs. In this day and age PPV numbers will always be the underlying factor when it comes down to negotiating big fights.
     
  9. Hermit

    Hermit Loyal Member banned

    44,341
    3
    Jan 29, 2008
    This pains me, but, I actually like Mayweather for this. :yep
     
  10. crimson

    crimson Boxing Addict banned

    5,899
    0
    Dec 8, 2009
    Good for Mayweather. I would be an idiot to believe that this is some moral stand against the Alphabets, but this is the right move.

    This does not really affect the Pac negotiation. If he wins versus Mosley, nobody will care about the belt. Most casual viewers cannot even differentiate between these stupid belts.
     
  11. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    Fighting for the titles makes the fight more marketable. In my mind. Why wouldn't he pay the sanctioning fees
     
  12. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    This fight is bigger than the belt !!
     
  13. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    :good:good:good
     
  14. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Would you pay over a 500K in sanction fees if you did'nt have too???
     
  15. Da Chin Chekka

    Da Chin Chekka Chi-Town!!! Full Member

    3,376
    0
    Jun 6, 2009
    Why should any boxer have to pay any fee to be the champ?:? Did the Yankees, Saints, or Lakers have to pay a fee to be recognized as World Champions?:verysad the WBA even created that
    This content is protected
    just to make more Champs and charge more fees. I wouldn't pay that **** either.:-(