Mayweather-Mosley test dates revealed

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BOSTONREDSOX, May 26, 2010.


  1. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    so much for blood testing right up to the fight hey floyd



    The United States Anti-Doping Agency confirmed Friday that the final blood sample taken from Shane Mosley was April 12 and the final one taken from Floyd Mayweather was April 13 as part of their agreement to undergo random, Olympic-style testing prior to their May 1 welterweight boxing match in Las Vegas.
    Mayweather won the fight by a wide unanimous decision. Each man was tested seven times prior to the fight and then again on the night of the fight by USADA, which will retain their samples for future testing. Each of the eight tests included required the fighters to provide urine samples; they were required to give blood four times.
    Mayweather gave blood and urine on March 22, April 1, April 13 and then May 1 after the fight. He gave urine only on April 3, April 6, April 21 and April 24.





    Mosley gave blood and urine on March 23, March 31, April 12 and then May 1 after the fight. He gave urine only on March 29, April 7, April 20 and April 26.



    http://sports.yahoo.com/box/news;_ylt=AqJA1DUKkRiQTLxUpc4586adCIh4?slug=ki-bloodtests052110
     
  2. Uncle Oden

    Uncle Oden Respect Guzman banned

    6,753
    0
    Feb 7, 2009
    You seriously hadn't read this story until just now?
     
  3. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    It doesn't matter when the tests stop, them being random with the possibility of tests up to the day of the fight is what would stop someone from juicing.
     
  4. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    bingo close thread
     
  5. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I don't think it matters if there is only one blood test 30 days before the fight, but as long as both fighters know they random and can pop up anytime. Drug tests are almost useless if they are not random.
     
  6. footballfan098

    footballfan098 Member Full Member

    260
    0
    Dec 22, 2009
    You're arguing the threat is what stops people from using PED's not the actual test.

    If that is the case people never have to actually be tested, the threat is good enough. We know that's not true. Or you can only test once to prove it will be done and never do it, the "threat" is enough to deter.
     
  7. TheBradyHawkes

    TheBradyHawkes ۞ Full Member

    2,209
    1
    Jul 5, 2008
    This.
     
  8. TheBradyHawkes

    TheBradyHawkes ۞ Full Member

    2,209
    1
    Jul 5, 2008
    Shane and Floyd were tested, and they also knew that they could have been tested at any point again. Obviously it worked.
     
  9. Atlanta

    Atlanta Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,688
    6
    Dec 26, 2009
    And in other news, an oil rig exploded in the gulf of Mexico.
     
  10. footballfan098

    footballfan098 Member Full Member

    260
    0
    Dec 22, 2009
    The threat of a test and the actual test are 2 separate things. The guy I quoted said the threat of the test was good enough for those final 18 days. If it's good enough for 18 days why not 30? or 40?

    The threat of a test will always be there if someone has the right to test whenever they want. You can have the threat without actually testing. As I said you can test once to show that the threat is real. Then don't test until the fight, the "threat" is still there which was argued is a valid reason for the fighters to not actually be tested.
     
  11. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006

    Well yeah...

    Random is the key word, Random. Especially when they show up at random multiple times in your training camp. You gonna juice knowing they could do it again at any time?

    You think a fighter in a big fight just tested would juice up knowing there could be more tests coming at a time they might not expect?

    I can't think of anyone stupid enough to juice for a big fight, risk their legacy and lose the paycheck, when they know they are under random drug testing... How many tests and when the tests are taken mean nothing compared to not knowing when the next test will be, or if there is one.

    I think what I said makes perfect sense.
     
  12. BOSTONREDSOX

    BOSTONREDSOX The Ghost Full Member

    2,048
    0
    Dec 10, 2007
    ya but the big question is way was the blood testing stopped so soon and just urine after that
    i'll tell you why. it was all just a dog and pony show
     
  13. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    I don't really believe that. Sounds like another ESB conspiracy theory to me.
     
  14. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    Reagan elected to second term!
     
  15. footballfan098

    footballfan098 Member Full Member

    260
    0
    Dec 22, 2009
    People do a lot of things that don't make sense. The US in particular is a win at all costs type of society. People cheat in every single sport knowing that there is random testing, hell Olympians even cheat with Olympic style testing, why would boxers be any different?


    My point is that the threat of testing isn't enough. That's not a deterrent to some athletes. If the threat and not the actual test was what is behind the "success" of testing keeping athletes clean you could test once in a while keeping the "threat" real while being cheaper and better for the athletes.

    The fact that they would leave an 18 day window shows me they agree with you, I personally don't think a threat isn't enough.