"Equal" everywhere except in the numbers, common opponents, PPV buys and purses. You have an interesting definition for that word. :think
Gander, you've come with some good posts lately.... JUST SAYIN U BEEN GIVIN CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE...:good YOUR POST DONT SHOW THE "BIAS" AS MUCH...IN MY OPINION OF COURSE!
you are stupid. Here is a post i made joking about Pacquiao's calves. http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8902378&postcount=13 Here is a response i got from a *******. http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=8902391&postcount=14
You taking a very odd angle with this one. You are basing your arguement on Floyd's numbers compared to PAC on "AVERAGE"....In OVERALL PPV buys, Revenue & PPV events PAC is sitting in the #1 position. Common opponents Floyd has produced slightly better numbers but again....that's to be expected. He's a US born fighter...we are talking about US PPV buys....PAC's not even from a neighboring country like Mexico to have an automatic latino fan base... So, all things considered PAC is doing alright....."on average":smoke
your wrong Lance...MOST FLOYD FANS ARE FANS OF BOXING AS WELL. TAKE ME...I'VE BEEN WATCHING THE SPORT SINCE BEFORE FLOYD WAS A PRO. I KNOW MY BOXING AND I "LITERALLY" FOLLOW OTHER FIGHTERS... MOST FANS KNOWN AS *******S DO NOT FOLLOW MANY OTHER FIGHTERS, IF ANY. SO YEA YOUR WAY OFF:deal
Nobody would base it on that. He fights more. Anyone would do this based on common opponents and highest draws. "Slightly"? So multiple hundreds of thousands at ~$50 a pop is "slight"? Another interesting use of a word. Anyway, 50/50 was the deal when Mayweather was OBVIOUSLY doing better. :deal
like the " FLOORED " " 8 OZ SPARRING GLOVES " from the *****s? :rofl:rofl you guys are consistent in "dumb" category