SDSFinest is an idiot fanboy guys. He sprouts nonesense then claims to own people. Adding him to the ignore list was the best move I did.
LOL-MY NUMBERS AREN'T FLAWED THOUGH- YOU WILL FIND THAT MANY NEGOTIATIONS WILL INCLUDE "COMMON FACTORS":deal AGAIN-I FOLLOW THE ENTIRE SPORT SINCE THE LATE 80'S BRO-I CAN TALK ANY PART OF BOXING U WANT- THE FACT IS, THEY DO USE PPV #'S TO DETERMINE PURSES..PLEASE BRING A BETTER ARGUMENT, AND BETTER INFO BEFORE U START SUGGESTING THINGS U DON'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT.:thumbsup
mayweather ppv de la hoya 2.4 hatton 920k jmm 1.05 mosley 1.4 ortiz 1.3 7,025,000 in 5 fights=1,405,000 average manny pacquiao de la hoya 1.2 hatton 850k cotto 1.2 clottey 750k (debatable-could be more or less) margarito 1.15 mosley 1.3 jmm 1.5 7,950,000 in 7 fights-1,135,714 average LANCE-PICK IT APART-IT'S CREDIBLE INFO..U ADD ME TO IGNORE CUZ I OWN EM ALL THE TIME.. ALL U DO IS INSULT N TROLL.. NOW TRY N TWIST THE #'S WIT YA ******* A$$:deal
9 pages n my $hit still ain't been picked apart! Keep tryin though- i'm yet to see any credible argument really-just people insulting and posting incorrect info- lmfao at the "yearly total" attempt-that was fukin stupid-we don't have "seasons" in boxing lol
A starting point to what? you say Oscar has to be used as a starting point... but why? Oscar fought Mayweather 5 fights ago manny fought Oscar 7 seven fights ago... surely the logical thing here would be to start at a point of equal fights ie 4/5 fights ago. it is just as meaningless as you 'START AT OSCAR AS A COMMON FACTOR' bs. the only reason you use Oscar as a starting point is because of record breaking numbers that skews the numbers in favour of your argument... WHICH IS BEING BIAS. since then manny and Mayweather have both had very similar numbers... were they to fight eachother they would no doubt get close to the huge numbers set by May and Oscar... so whats your point???
I disagree THE NUMBERS BEFORE OSCAR WITH PAC AND FLOYD ARE MUCH MUCH DIFFERENT- THEY WERE BOTH AVERAGING ABOUT 300-400K PER FIGHT BEFORE FIGHTING OSCAR Oscar was where they started to get into the 1 million per PPV (LESS RICKY HATTON AND CLOTTEY). MY ARGUMENT IS THAT OSCAR IS THE BEST COMMON FACTOR TO USE- IT'S THE "FIGHT" WHERE THE NUMBERS "CLEARLY" CHANGE FOR BOTH FIGHTERSthumbsup
Thanks for debating this too Thomas! It's rare that you get someone willing to actually look at EVERYTHING and not ignore certain facts that are very relevant to the debate.
I'm not saying there isn't enough money for a 50/50..I'm simply putting the #'s out there to show you where they stand from a draw standpoint-PPV #'s are a good way to measure that.
the split should be 50/50 and make it 65/35 if the winner wins by KO or make it 55/45 if its a decision
Split should be 45/45 with winner getting rest its only fair. I estimate ppv #s are going to be over 2mil for sure, but under 2.5. The price for the ppv is going to be something insane and that might hurt its sales.