According to Koncz, Pacquiao was "not angry nor upset. We gave them a chance and we were nice to them but they werent nice to us" which resulted in the lawsuit. scene of boxing
I agree --- no case. Where the **** is all this **** going ??? All I can see is that if they want to make money -- they fight. And if they want to fight -- they test. So --- they have to agree to the testing. Everything else is bull****.
ladies and gentlemen this is america or britain depending on the obvious either way innocent untill proven guilty
Why then do you even care about the fight if you believe Pacquiao is already guilty because of the "overwhelming evidence"? Go start a thread calling out all ESB members to ban Pacquiao from boxing forever. Start showing everyone here you actually believe yourself the stuff coming out of your mouth.
You don't prove a negative. The lack of proof that Pac is on something is the proof that he isn't on something. It works the same way for the Easter bunny, unicorns, leprechauns, and god. You should understand that............
I don't know about the UK, but here in America we have something called "innocent until proven gulity". "Guilty until proven innocent" is a mentality practiced by barbaric or commie regimes. You believe in that you may as well consider Osama Bin Laden your hero. BTW, Manny Pacquiao has passed 10 previous officially mandated doping tests. Even in Floyd's own hometown of Grand Rapids, Michigan he gets bashed by the local paper for their ridiculous demands. This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected , This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
thats exactly whats going to happen the law suit would be out the window on the fight will still happen with the drug test. everything cant go mannys way