>>> Mayweather-Pacquiao, who ducked who this time? <<<

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by puga_ni_nana, Feb 2, 2012.


  1. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    :lol: Looks like the honeymoon is over for Floyd. The few weeks where most of the boxing world was backing him instead of Manny might be over with his refusal of 50/50. Maybe he was just teasing us all along and never intended to fight Pac.
     
  2. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,662
    0
    Nov 6, 2011

    Pac is such a ****ing lousy fighter, with no technique whatsover, can't even cut the ring, taking on old, drained, washed-up fighters!

    But he has to be tested first before fighting floyd! :rofl:rofl

    Glad you see floydiot-logic at it's best, Anima!
     
  3. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Yes it is. Just like 14 days, Pac walked away. It was off the table because Mosley did it and it was NO PROBLEM. Then Pac said, "I agree to everything." Then Pac was caught in a lie by Michael Koncz on HBO 24 7 showing that they offered 7 days. Like now when Arum didn't know who to call, but now they were in negotiations.

    Pac is a liar and a fraud. He won't step up as a man to make this fight. His fans are clowns for not seeing his lies.
     
  4. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    50-50 is fair but Arum never had any intent on letting the fight happen. Arum was talking about building a stadium in heaven for a fight for november . . . end of the day Arum is not done milking Manny and any TRUE PacFan would be pissed off at that point!
     
  5. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,662
    0
    Nov 6, 2011
    so which one is it? :rofl

    he's such a lousy fighter according to Floyd himself but he has to be tested! :huh

    please explain that logic or even better, please explain floydiot-logic :think
     
  6. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    floyd and his camp has no problem with 50/50 back in the first nego. also you *****s have no problem with the split until floyd priced himself out of it and now will fight pac's victim.
     
  7. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    so let's say that floyd is right and arum is to blame. after the cotto fight and floyd still refuses 50/50 split and still won't fight pacquiao, would you still not blame floyd?
     
  8. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Yeah idiot. They also had no problem with a 14 day cut off.

    The problem is that Pac proved himself to be a fraud by having such a hard fight with JMM and saying he will take less than 50%. Also, other men have been confident enough about being CLEAN that they took the testing.

    Things changed. :deal
     
  9. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Obvious idiot who knows NOTHING about Boxing.

    Clean fighters aren't afraid to drug test. Period. Is Pac a clean fighter?

    Explain your ******* logic as to why YOU don't think Pac should test. He is a CLEAN fighter right? :hey
     
  10. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    yeah apparently floyd always changes his mind when it comes to pacquiao.
     
  11. bald_head_slick

    bald_head_slick Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,388
    2
    May 15, 2009
    Um...

    Pac asked for less than 50%.

    FROSDT is what FMJ asked for from the beginning.

    Pac is the one changing his mind... then changing it back... then changing it again... He is a man full of fear. :deal
     
  12. Nazarene

    Nazarene Active Member Full Member

    1,158
    10
    Sep 28, 2007
    floyd. this fight should be 50/50 split. floyd clearly ducking.
     
  13. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    big difference baldy,

    pac changing his stance to concede to floyd's demands.

    floyd is changing his stance to move the goalpost.
     
  14. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    http://www.examiner.com/boxing-in-l...onversations-expects-pacquiao-foe-by-saturday

    When I met with Floyd four of five times, I’ve got to give him credit, he pleasantly surprised me,” Koncz continued. “He was very professional, very respectful, [but] it didn’t work out. I thought we made a reasonable, faire offer.
    This content is protected
    He had other plans obviously so I wish him luck and we’re going to move on. We’re not devastated by the fact that we’re not fighting Floyd.”
    ...............

    floyd probly realized that a fight against pac is very risky.
     
  15. angelos

    angelos Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,623
    1
    Dec 8, 2007
    Both were ta fault. I voted for Pac coz team arum is very clear from the very beginning that he doesnt want floyd on may5. Now they are making it looked like in the media that its 1o0% floyds fault. Booo.