Mayweather Pacquiao: Who really won

It's not a troll it's a very fair assessment of a non bias fan and if you think floyd won then good for you that's your assessment but for me it's very clear that the fight was very close but pac edged it by being the aggressor and landing the better and harder punches.

 

Cmon dude

 

Didn't even read it... a complete waste of my time, but I did see the bottom sentences, again, weak, very very weak.


Anyway, when you grow some nuts and you want a straight bet let me know.

 

hey i'm not forcing you to believed but i'm just giving my very honest assessment on this fight without any bias.

 

So did Lance Armstrong. He sued everyone that accused him. look how that turned out.

 

And look how Pac turned out.

 

He never got caught. That's pretty much the extent of it. Filing a lawsuit doesn't make you innocent.

 

I remember how much I wanted Pacquiao to win this one.

But he didn’t. I had it 8-4ish

 

Not only did he never get caught, they never found a smoking gun with all the heat on him.

No IVgate as was on Floyd. No tainted meat like Canelo. No false positives on urine and blood tests like Morales and a few others. No “no-show” like the charlo brothers. No Evan fields registration. No hiring a ped distributor, attempting to hide his name and then turning up to a fight with bacne at 39 years old. No high levels of the substance detected as was with Mosley and RJJ. No masking substances.

So many theories. Atlas emails. Funny shakes. Butt injections but nada.

Yet so many others got caught.

so ye, he maintains his innocence and and his accusers were the one proven to have been on something.

Thomas Haussers reports which are as impartial as they come have implicated a lot of boxers, not once did it implicate Pac.

 

Are you this passionate/aggressive with PED accusations against any other fighter?

 

Look it up you lazy a$$

 

Aggressive? Your reading way too much into this. Just pointing out that suing someone for defamation doesn't make you innocent. I assume just about everyone is on something.

 

Clenelo and Marquez threatened to sue their accusers, but didn't. Seems to me like if one is innocent, they'd try to clear their name and certainly not bring it into focus if they're guilty.

Lance was a special case as he enjoyed Michael Jordan global levels of admiration.

 

Roger Clemens sued Mcnamee for defamation. Clemens never failed a drug test in his life. Baseball at that time was riddled with steroids and I am sure Clemens is not innocent. There is enough suspicion to keep him out of the hall.

 

Well, the smoking gun was McNamee.