Mayweather responds to Cotto on ESPN... (video)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Tito Time, Mar 31, 2008.


  1. the_truth

    the_truth Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,042
    0
    Oct 15, 2005
    it def. takes talent but then again as he moved up, corrales was known for one great fight, the first castillo fight was controversial, carlos hernandez was on his way to retirement which he did after the mayweather fight, gatti a good figther with heart but realistically not an "A" level opponent, baldomir a Cinderella story enough said, Judah perform well until the 10th round event, beat DLH in split decision I still give mayweather credit for winning this one with no controversy, and we all know Hatton has no business at 147...

    now honestly wouldn't this resume if mayweather ever considers it be more impressive, cotto, williams, cintron, margarito, or even quintana...
     
  2. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006
    my sentiments exactly. you can talk all this **** about floyd being a coward and a fraud but you have done absolutely nothing yourself to compare to what floyd has done and who he has defeated:deal




    wrong again as usual..casa won the wba 130 title in may of 2000. floyd won his 130 wbc in october of 1998:deal your just spouting lives to justify your personal bias. before it's all said and done I will put you to shame in front of all the posters on ESB:admin and since you mentioned casa and freitas which one was ranked higher then diego corrales on thep4p list:deal don't worry I'll wat:hey



    are you afraid to mention spadafora's name now:yep :rofl once again at 135 who faced the better comp and won; floyd or spadafora? do you think floyd would have struggled with sosa or dorin like spadafora did. :lol:


    has cotto, spadafora, freitas, or casamayor ever unified a weight class:deal and cotto has never defeated a champion at 147 or any weight class for that matter. floyd defeated baldomir and zab and took their titles, are you saying that beating an old mosley who hasn't won a championship fight in over 3 years is better than baldomir who actually stepped up and beat one. Floyd for the record has defeated 2 that trumps any contender on cotto's record:deal


    so to sum up what you have been posting incessanly since the hatton loss.

    1. floyd is a fraud because he won't face cotto in his next fight.

    2. Floyd is a fraud and coward because he hasn't faced casamayor, freitas, and zyu

    3. floyd should forget about the money owed to him and face cotto next If he doesn't then he is a coward and not a real champion:deal

    none of your points holds up under scrutiny, I mean you do now what scrutiny is:lol: :rofl
     
  3. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    I guess Zab, Bruseles and Baldomir all had bigger fanbases than Cotto :roll:


    Fraud is a sad excuse for a "warrior".
     
  4. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006

    2 weight divison champ defeated casamayor, castillo (the first fighter to ko castilo) and freitas, and many more to numerous to name. You may have a problem with floyd but please try and remain objective when you speak of chico. he will not be rembered for only one fight he had a hof career and was one of the most dominat 130 fighters in the last 20 years.


    floyd won a UD I don't see anything controversial about that.


    do you hate floyd tat much you just make **** up. carlos hernandez had 13 more fights after floyd and even went on to win the IBF 130 title and defended that title and beat steve forbes before losing to erik morales.


    and what business does floyd have at 147. stop making excuses hatton belonged in the ring with floyd at 147 :deal


    no it wouldn't williams, margarito, cintron and cotto have done nothing remotely equal to what floyd has done. the only fight left for floyd at 147 is to face the winner of the margarito vs cintron vs cotto tournament and then unify 147 against whover the winner is. he doesn't need to fight all of them only the best one or the last one standing.
     
  5. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,060
    35,179
    Jun 23, 2005
    :lol: :rofl :rofl :lol: :rofl I'm cool with both of ya'll but great post!:good
     
  6. Guru_Too_You

    Guru_Too_You ESB OG circa '99 Full Member

    3,217
    0
    Jul 24, 2004
    If they aint hatin on you you aint makin no noise.

    Now back to my own semi-retirement.

    Big ups to all you Floyd haters.
     
  7. obedt

    obedt Member Full Member

    188
    0
    Feb 8, 2007
    I don't know about the others, but I don't have a problem w/ Floyd doing these pointless rematches, dancing on TV, and rassling. [Now, I realize none of this has anything to do w/ the betterment of the sport, unlike the Golden Gloves donation he made, those other moves are only meant for the betterment of Floyd Mayweather, Jr] I DO have a problem with him keeping the WW belt when he is avoiding the division (c'mon guys, we all know Hatton is no WW). I say he loses/drops/is stripped of the belts and can continue avoiding the welterweights just fine.

    No one has provided a proper explanation as to how beating Carlos Baldomir 16 months ago has earned Floyd a lifetime WW belt. It shouldn't work like that.
     
  8. bigtime9

    bigtime9 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,980
    0
    May 11, 2006

    what the **** are you talking about:blood the "betterment of the sport" what the **** is that:admin this is a business fighters get paid to win not for the "betterment of the sport":deal please enlightenus at esb on just what the **** you are talking about:rofl :nut


    every move he makes should be for his benefit and that of his family's. are you saying floyd should not have a chance to maximize his profits after years of tough training and figts. where was this condemnation of pacquiao when he faced morales and barrera 5 times.

    you think flod gets up every morning thnking he has to answer to a bunch of nameless ******s on a message board:deal

    which welterweight belt are you talking about. you ****ing ****** boys crak me up. here are the facts whether you like them or not:

    fact #1: floyd is the WBC/RIng welterweight champion. this means floyds championship fights are sanctioned by the WBC, not nameless posters on esb:deal

    fact #2: floyd vs ricky was a defense of floyd's WBC title. hatton beng a former WBA champ and a 140 ring champion was mandated as floyd's #1 challenger. The WBC could not rank cotto, williams, or cintron since they all owned belts.

    fact #3 : Since Floyd defended his WBC title in dec he has up to a year to make another defense:deal and he can make one voluntary defense.


    your mind can't grasp reality it's all ****ed up with hate:deal floyd just got through defending his WBC/ring title he doesn't need to fight cotto at this moment. amd I prefer to let the fight build where cotto takes another strap and then they can unify:deal
     
  9. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    For Fraud to pretend like Cotto aint worthy or doesnt have enough fans is nothing if not STUPID.

    The dude is clearly ducking him, as he has already clearly ducked Winky, Margarito and Shane. Fighters fight and duckers duck.
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    It's utterly STUPID for Floyds fanboys to defend this when Floyd WANTED to fight a greener version already. Morons...
     
  11. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    In 2005, after the Gatti fight, Arum talked of matching Cotto wit Mayweather. Cotto was about 25 at the time, or about the same age as when Floyd won and defended his 130 lb. title 9 times. Cotto was also a top 3 Jr. WW. At the time, the biggest fights Floyd could make in that division were against Hatton and Cotto. Currently, Cotto is once again a top fighter in Floyd's division. However, Floyd is no longer under Arum. In fact, he's suing him. Furthermore, he has alot more options and can make more money fighting DLH and Hatton again. I'm not making a judgement as to whom he should fight, I'm simply stating the situatuion has changed; he has more options than he did in 2005.
     
  12. Knob McDude

    Knob McDude Active Member Full Member

    1,056
    0
    Mar 3, 2006
    Cotto has earned the right to fight Mayweather, in most boxing fans and critics opinion.

    No matter how many times Floyd says it, it will never be fact that Cotto needs to do more.

    If he is not fighting him because Cotto doesn't bring enough money to the table, fine.

    Just don't tell us you are no longer fighting for money, but legacy.

    Right now nobody furthers his legacy more, than a victory over Cotto. Not a rematch with De La Hoya, and certainly not a rematch with Hatton.
     
  13. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    You should work for the Bush admin. :lol:

    If DLH was still promoted by Arum I wonder if Fraud would find a way to work with him. :huh
     
  14. glscotland

    glscotland ****ing Legend Full Member

    805
    0
    Mar 27, 2008
    theres only 1 ricky hatton
    wembley 2009 he will be victorious
    only reason he lost last time was becos of referee
    hatton will become the best p4p boxer on the planet
     
  15. MattyC808

    MattyC808 Member Full Member

    238
    0
    Feb 14, 2006
    Cotto's record is just as good as Floyd's Mosley and Judah are beyond solid wins. What needs to happen is a universal boxing commission so two top prime contenders don't actually fight happens again.