Mayweather Sr. "Pacquiao is Not in My Son's League"

Wow - So Snr was in their corner? You sure utterly failed on that one trolly.

 

Senior Mayweather is right. Pacquiao isn't in Junior Mayweather's league.

 

THE RING RATINGS: AS OF SEPT. 20, 2009

http://www.ringtv.com/ratings/

Pound For Pound

All Weights

• 1. Manny Pacquiao
  
  
  This content is protected
  Country: Philippines
  
  Record: 49-3-2 (37 KOs)
  
  Ranking: This Week: #1 | Last Week: #1 | Weeks On List: 303
  
  Titles: The Ring

:smoke

• 2. Floyd Mayweather Jr.
  
  
  This content is protected
  Country: USA (Las Vegas, Nevada)
  
  Record: 40-0-0 (25 KOs)
  
  Ranking: This Week: #2 | Last Week: - | Weeks On List: 1

This content is protected

http://www.ringtv.com/blog/1128/ring_ratings_update_does_mayweather_deserve_his_ring_rankings_/

Posted Sep. 21, 2009 at 09:42pm
By Doug Fischer


Floyd Mayweather Jr.’s dominating unanimous decision over Juan Manuel Marquez was impressive.

I thought the former five-division titleholder controlled every second of every minute of every round against one of the sport’s elite fighters. However, I never lost sight of the fact that Marquez is a lightweight, which put Mayweather’s win in its proper perspective.

As a comeback fight it was a tremendous victory that demonstrated that Mayweather hasn’t lost any of the speed, reflexes and defensive prowess that made him one of the top fighters of the past two decades. As excellent as Marquez was at 126, 130 and 135 pounds, though, he was nothing special at welterweight.

A victory over Marquez at welterweight should not catapult any fighter up THE RING’s 147-pound and pound-for-pound rankings, but that’s just what happened to Mayweather in this week’s updated RING Ratings.

To paraphrase Roy Jones Jr. -- who preceded Mayweather as the American boxer everyone overrated because of uncanny athletic ability and careful matchmaking -- I think my colleagues at THE RING “musta forgot” that Marquez is a lightweight (even though he holds the magazine’s 135-pound title).

This content is protected

http://sports.yahoo.com/box;_ylt=AqUuGora4YdWX9cMfo5u3f2UxLYF?poll_id=48538&wv=1

Poll Results
Who is boxing's pound-for-pound king?

Floyd Mayweather Jr. 31%
Manny Pacquiao

This content is protected

Other 3%

100332 Total Votes

This content is protected

 

You mean Roger.

 

Unless I'm mistaken, I think he was being sarcasti, and his whole point was that there isn't much in the "WW elites" for Floyd to pick from. And he's going at this based on the assumption that Cotto loses to Pac.

 

Pac could have UD'd David Diaz, ODLH, and Hatton if he wanted to play around and let them continue.

However he did us and boxing a favor. and that was put his opponents out of their misery.

 

IN your DREAMS MAYBE. i am not a PBF fan but after he beat JMM. you better RECONIZE,,,,,,,:smoke

 

So Roach was training Manny in those fights was he?

And so my original post of

"Roach 1 - Mayweather Snr 0"

Would still be accurate.

MIP4P1 - Between Floyd's balls and Nallege's ass, your tongue must get tired from all that licking.

 

MIp4p1 is p4pdapest. i mean, p4pdabest. :rofl

i guess the pedo is back. :yep:rofl

 

OK, I guess you are more credible than The Ring. You really convinced me. How about the Yahoo polls? Boxing fans have spoken.

 

http://www.ringtv.com/about/

Now show me a ratings model from any other alphabet gang that is more transparent or more accountable than that one.

The Ring belt is flawed in that you don't HAVE to defend it against the number one contender, it's not perfect, but it's hardly like the "GBP Ring Ratings Bord".

For example:

 

No need for NALLEGE to show you anything. According to him, as long as the agenda belittles Pac and/or glorifies Floyd Jr., it is credible.

 

:good