Mayweather v Buchanan @ LW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Decy, May 9, 2014.


  1. Decy

    Decy Barely Coherent Full Member

    3,877
    157
    Oct 23, 2006
    Who wins? Ken fought better fighters at the weight but Floyd has the better career.
     
  2. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Buchanan would have found a way to bust his ass....Period!
     
  3. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,131
    8,582
    Jul 17, 2009
    Mayweather would have eked out a close decision. I loved Buchanan but Floyd just about had the edge.
     
  4. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    Floyd outboxes Buchanan and wins a UD.
     
  5. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    348
    Jul 13, 2007
    With the skill set Mayweather has demonstrated in his career, IMO he would outpoint Buchanan.
     
  6. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    552
    Feb 19, 2014
    Ken was exceptional. I never did like the fact that Duran fouled him and was rewarded with the title as a result. Floyd, though, would outbox him in a close fight.
     
  7. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    Floyd at his best wins a comfortable UD. Ken gets outsped.
     
  8. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    I would love to see Floyd vs a master boxer like Ken because I have not seen how he adapts to a good mover with a jab. I think Floyd would take a close decision because he had the edge in hand speed but Ken was gritty
     
  9. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    I'd go with Mayweather in a split decision, though I see Buchanan giving him plenty to think about in earning it.
     
  10. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,131
    8,582
    Jul 17, 2009

    Agreed. Ken may well have been the best Brit fighter ever P4P
     
  11. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

    Kens lateral movement and Jab would give Floyd hell, plus he had an amazing work rate and fighting spirit and was teak tough all over on quite ridiculous levels, as was his stamina. He also had an atg varied jab and countered with class. His jab was like a piston constantly pumping out while he moved laterally.

    Kens lack of power means this defo goes to points where I cant split them. 50/50 fight.

    Ken was hard to get to because his footwork and upper body movement was so good but he tended to leave his head unprotected at times, especially when he attacked the body with 2 3 punch combos. This exposed his iron head to uppercuts. I could see Floyd having a field day at times countering Kens body attacks with uppercuts, and pot shooting him clean with straight rights from range if Ken slowed down.

    Ring IQ is even between the two but Floyds speed and reach could be the key to victory if Ken's movement isn't up to scratch.
     
  12. ribtickler68

    ribtickler68 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,985
    131
    Apr 27, 2013
    I am surprised at that opinion, Foxy. You must rate Buchanan very highly. I do,
    too and think Ken had the speed and movement to give Floyd problems.

    I have to pick Floyd, though; I think he is very hard to beat and I think only the absolute greatest fighters could do it. Maybe someone who could force him into a fight like Duran, Pryor or Armstrong?
     
  13. rossco666

    rossco666 Guest

  14. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    416
    Sep 25, 2005
    Kenny was very clever but also tended to do the same thing consistently and that would play into Floyd's skill set, he would take advantage of that for a close decision of two highly skilled boxers.
     
  15. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012