Mayweather v Pac - fight off!

Evander never dodged a test when asked.

 

I agree that Pacquiao is innocent until proven guilty, that's not my point in all this. My point, like Jet's is that his team made a bunch of bull**** excuses and somehow Floyd is the one that is getting blamed by some for the fight not getting made. Mayweather has bent over backwards to Pac's stipulations. The NY newspaper article is pretty damning though. Sure it's not enough to condemn the man completely, but it doesn't paint a rosey picture.

 

You'll forgive me if I don't put much creedence in anything Tim Smith writes.

 

Absolutely, but as I said, it's asking for a lawsuit if it's not on the money.

 

What's funny Ippy....Team Pac have filed a law suit against Floyd and GBP AFTER weeks of negotiationg with them about drug tests.

I mean... they were prepared to negotiate the testing but when they didn't get what they want it turns to defamation of character? How? LOL.

They are complete jerk offs in this. Malignaggi was as public as anyone in raising suspicions about Manny. I don't see his name in any defamation suit....in fact Arum was talking about Pac v Malignaggi when Floyd was off. atsch

Floyd KO 1 early days.

 

That is one lawsuit that will never see the light of day. Manny's case has more holes in it than JFK.

Call it mind games, brinkmanship, whatever you want. Team Mayweather are all over Team Pacquiao at this stage. I have no doubt that the fight will go ahead. It might be one more fight each before something at the back end of the year.

 

i heard a whisper of drug use, but not peds. Would that be why if a pos test came back he would want it quiet?

 

I keep hearing about these mysterious emails that have surfaced from Pacs camp asking about positive tests.

Surely it wouldn't be too hard to produce them?

Ask Malcolm Turnball about the last time he relied on an email sent to him...

 

cold case.....you think you superiors would let you look into that ..? :rofl

or police are as corrupt as the yanks. our last commisioner was the head of the freemasons......atsch

talk about ****ed.....:-(

 

Mate just questions thrown into the mix at the end. Me perosnally would be happy with the drug screen after the fight. I am pretty confident that PBF could beat Pac on/off PED's.

If they could get the sanctioning body to do a random drug test 3 weeks before the fight, PAC would be cool with that? I guess he'd have to less he get fined and banned.

 

All good Oz.

Few things...

A random test 3 weeks before the fight?... it's not really random then if the date is known mate.

I think I know what you are saying...Pac should narrow his window down to three weeks?.... well Floyd has given a concession on the random part by having a cut off date of 14 days. Pac refused.

Don't expect a sanctioning body to apply random blood testing to their procedures mate. For one, this sport doesn't care too much about ped's and it's an expensive exercise. You think the IBO, WBA, WBC IBF etc want to cook their sanctioning dollars on lab fees? :think

I'd bet my balls that almost every urine sample taken by a commission or a sanc org is flushed down the toilet two minutes after it is collected.

 

Anyone who is a professional boxer should get unannounced tests every year.

Tough titties if they dont like it.

 

:good

Especially considering the nature of the sport...the best testing methods available should be adopted. But it is boxing we are talking about here...

 

Agreed, 100%