he won both the crowd and the fight...idk how the judges scored that bout when all mayweather did is hold castillo's arms and defense..he did a little countering but he still didnt do enough..not to mention he is the challenger of that fight...
Challenger means nothing. Mayweather was 24 years old. injured and outweighed by 10lbs. Its Castillo's fault. You could easily give Mayweather the first 5 rounds, shouldnt have dug himself in that hole
It was Castillo's fault he allowed Mayweather to win the first half of the fight. Cant read? You a high school drop out too?
How people can say Mayweather won hands down blows my mind. Listen, I'm a Pacquiao fan through and through, but I'll admit that anyone who thinks he won either JMM fight "hands down" is out of their minds. Even the most devoted PBF fans should have the mental wherewithal to admit that at the very least it was a fight that could have went either way. I think Castillo slightly deserved the win, personally, but how anyone can say Floyd won going away is just...pathetic.
Both Pimp C, Eze and myself maintain that scoring the fight for Castillo is not out of the question. And there is no such criteria as "deserving" to win. There is either you win the rounds or you dont. I feel that Marquez "deserved" to beat Pacquiao but that Pacquiao won by 1 point. If Castillo lost the first 5 rounds against an injured 24 year old, he didnt "deserve" anything. Because he sure as hell didnt win 7 straight.
Don't you realise that you are making excuses all the time? Injured? Who cares? Floyd won a fight with injuries before. Get over it you little *****
MichiganWarrior, this fight was at least as much of a 'robbery' as Dirrell-Froch, possibly more so. Interesting that you defend the American fighter (and US-based judges) in this one too.....
First fight, as far as I can remember ,was a "ruff ass "fight for Floyd, but he def won. Second fight Floyd all the way....Not close at all. Thats just me