Mayweather vs Marquez... This just became a career definer!!!

I didn't think Hatton was shot, I love Hatton but know that he just isn't at that level, I knew Mayweather & Pac would beat his ass, as much as I didn't want them too, I just knew.

I don't think that Floyd can be no 1 if he beats Marquez either, as much as I feel Marquez beat Pac, it's not the same as it's not at the same weight.

 

Floyd by Knockout RD: 6

 

Oscar wasn't weight drained when he fought Mayweather.

 

I think it could be said that people don't fully realize just how hungry for the next level of fame and recognition Marquez is. He's starving for it, IMHO. If Mayweather doesn't show initiative, it will be a potentially challenging fight for him.

 

I believe this will be a great technical fight with both guys very weary of each other playing defense for the first half of the fight. I expect after six that Floyd will come out attacking a bit more often, but JMM might pop a counter attack to step him back a few. If that happens and JMM strengthens after eight, if Floyd doesn't get KO"d or TKO'd the JMM would have enough on points. But as I conspire I believe whatever happens JMM will lose on politics with points, Pac won't fight him again for one, and a Pac Floyd fight is much more of a money maker with the mainstream buys. I hope for JMM to KNTFO of Floyd for the best and realest fight for the new decade to occur with Pac Jmm 3

 

hmm says... JMM deserves more of the cut cause they're using his fanbase to sell more (cough cough) Mexican Independence Day

 

calling a close fight a robbery is plain wrong. that is why we have every fight here at ESB that went the distance a robbery even if it was a clear decision what more if its a close fight?

nobody said hatton is a great fighter. but the way pac demolished hatton was not expected by many. did you even pick pac to stop hatton in two rounds? the way you are acting its like you called it like roach himself when he said pac would stop hatton in 3.

and lastly, calling other posters name would not made your points stronger.

 

now it's much better than crying to high heaven about robbery when its a close fight. i admit that jmm gave pac hell but so did pac to jmm. if you say that either of them had it easy, you are just a bias observer.

you are saying hatton was shot? so how good was hatton when he was not shot according to you? and weren't you impressed that even if you picked pac in 5 or 6, he did it in just 2? or you would not give pac credit because hatton is shot by your standards?

 

That you need to mention Pac's name to hype this fight makes you JMMorons insecure about your fighter's legacy. It makes Pac greater in your eyes. Deal with it, Pac is the real number one.

 

ok you are a huge pac fan, i'll give you the benefit of the doubt. so you don't think highly of hatton because he is not a fine/great technician? fair enough since i feel that you favor a certain style over the other. it's just that if you think hatton's style is ****, it doesn't necessarily make him shot. a shot fighter doesn't stop someone like malignaggi who was not even stopped by a beast like cotto.