This has to be one of the most deluded and far-fetched things I've ever read on here. I can guarantee you on one thing in that paranoid filled rant of yours- you can't back up any of those claims with corroborative evidence. It's just one delusional man's opinion. This isn't the 30's-40's anymore. the mafia doesn't run boxing. You can think whatever you want of AL Haymon, but if he was rigging fights so often, why did he "allow" Broner to lose than? Haymon might be guilty of putting together some awful fights, but I seriously doubt he's rigging anything. Floyd doesn't even get love from the judges in his adopted hometown. When it goes to the scorecards in his fights, it's a guessing game as to how the judges will be scoring it. You're crazy if you think he'll be coming into fight night at 165 lbs with loaded gloves on. So basically paceman doesn't care one bit for his own personal health fighting someone with bricks on their hands?? Conspiracy theory that has absolutely no merit behind it. Provide one veritable example to back up anything in your lunatic rant.
it's really silly to believe all this nonsense about fight being rigged. But again, people will believe conspiracies, there are those who subscribe for such things Pacquiao is well known for love of his country and he will go in there to DESTROY Floyd Mayweather. If he beats Floyd, it will be good for his Country, legacy and his $$ making potential for future fights. If he beats Floyd, he can claim A side for a re-match and demand 50/50 at least. Everyone that knows Pacquiao knows that he's very devoted to his family, country and his legacy as a boxing great. Floyd has publicly accused him of taking PEDs, of being broke to the point where he even sued Floyd. To think that Pacquiao would allow Floyd to beat him and not want to win badly for the aforementioned reasons, is just paranoid and stupid, no offense. Secondly, who here believes that Bob Arum would agree to let Floyd win and not capitalize on the benefits of Pacquiao winning? There is hate between Bob and Floyd yet Bob Arum would agree to such a thing. Floyd didn't accept this just because other side agreed to let him win, he accepted because he had to, pressure was building, he was missing out of a mega pay day and he knows his legacy would be in question forever. Stop this nonsense, it makes no sense given the person Pacquiao is, those involved and how the benefits of winning greatly outweigh the consequences of losing, for Manny. If Manny wins, it will be HUGE for Phillipines, for his legacy, his family and he can demand 50/50, 60/40 in a rematch! Manny wants to win badly and isn't going to sell his soul, integrity, principles to the devil - Floyd, a man who has disrespected him. Manny will go in there to CRUSH Floyd and bring glory to Phillipines and himself.
It will be 1 fight if it's rigged. Mayweather wins no rematch. Mayweather knows his legacy is at stake. I know it's not like the old days but people still talk about the Liston vs Ali fights and say if both or one of them were fixed. Both looked fixed to me by the mob but even now people are questioning it. It's different today of course but i'd expect there'd be better ways of hiding it. Primo Carnera was another one and Jake Lamotta. I think Primo has openly admitted to fixed fights.
Maybe Floyd and Haymon tried to rig the fight but they failed and that's why Floyd ept on ducking and stalling and was FINALLY FORCED into the fight by Les Moonves. No chance of a fix unless Haymon buys 2 of the judges and Floyd runs for his life.
arum is richer than al haymon by a wide margin, people forget that. no way in hell he would let his cash cow be bullied into participating in a fixed fight. the people thinking mayweather will have all the judges and refs in his pocket might be surprised on may 2nd.
It sounds nuts but there's a lot of money to be made here. I could totally see a maidana situation unfold- very close first fight with Floyd winning and then a rematch where he blows Pac out. A rematch would make both fighters at least 2-3x of any other fight out there
That is exactly what is happening. Too much money involved to not have a rematch. Put yourself in their shoes, would you really want to seal the deal after 1 fight? Nope, you would make sure there is at least one more fight to really drain the public and make your bank account fatter. It's going to be an extremely close fight decided on points, or a very controversial stoppage so a rematch is demanded.
Im shocked that not 1 person formally apologized to this man after his prediction came true. A real man admits when hes wrong, clearly many of you have growing up to do.