I just want to figure something out pick a or b A) baldomir was one of the worst welterweight champions ever, D-class oscar peaked 10 years earlier, was well, well past his prime hatton had already been shown by luis collazo that he was no welterweight marquez was a natural feather who looked small at light, yet was made jump to welter (and was past his prime as well anyway) mosley was 38, rustier than the Titanic, and always loses to boxers or B) baldomir was the toughest welterweight challenge at the time oscar showed against mayorga that he was still prime hatton was undefeated at welter (1-0) and had a great chin marquez was really a welterweight trapped in a featherweight's body mosley was young, fresh and busy, and always beats boxers :think
I dont hate Floyd and can pick some truths from both options.Hatton had been shown by Collazo that welter did not suit him(i thought he lost)but Oscar was not past it when Floyd beat him and Mosley sure did not look ancient and rusty against Margo.The Marquez fight proved nothing as he is too light and is made for Floyd.
well his last 5 opponents have an average age of 35 years old, his last two has an average age of 37.5.
Popkins Welcome to my ignore list. Entry criteria are simple, you need to display complete lack of objectivity towards one boxer over another. Put simply, fanboys make Wig's ignore list.
Baldomir: crap fighter,decent win,boring performance Oscar: good fighter past his best though, good win, good performance Hatton: good fighter only above his weight,good win,good performance Marquez: at 147 a shadow of the real marquez, crap win, bad performance cheated at the weigh in and should have knocked marquez out at that weight. Mosley: old version of himelf but decent,good win totally dominated after round 2, good performance.