man you are hopeless, it doesn't matter if he is a full time 154'r or not what matter is he is a legit 154 champ. i leave you alone with this i am done with you :good
what does it matter to you if floyd fights thurman and wins 8-4 theyll say "thurman isnt that good"....."thurman was too green"...... if thurman gives floyd a close/tough fight and floyd wins 7-5...itll just be "floyd got exposed by a young lion......thurman was robbed...haha omg floyd sucks" basically alot of you guys hate the guy so much im shocked you even watch him fight...or want to talk about a guy who is such a coward.....most of you will never appreciate or ever be happy with anything he does.....why even waste your time?
I don't understand how one fighter can be a beast yet the guy who destroyed him is a cherry pick I do but I don't as far as best win no I don't think Corrales is his best win most visually entertaining maybe but wins over Castillo, Hoya, Alvarez.ect I'd rate over the Corrales just to name a few. Thing about it though is a cherry pick for Mayweather is most fighters best win. Maidana, Guerrero, Alvarez, & Cotto would be top wins on every fighter between WW and JMW Cotto is Pacquiao's best win Martinez is fighting Cotto two years after Mayweather and he just said Cotto will be the best he's been in with. The Pacquiao fight is really the only fight I can think of the 100% absolutely should have happen and like I said earlier Mayweather told Pacquiao in 09' he gets pick of ring, gloves, top billing, enter as champ, 50/50 split, weight penalty an everything Pacquiao wanted and he still said no what more can you do.
To me these are highly inflated evaluations, at least for some of the fighters. Mosley is no where near a 8/10 he was basically a shot fighter, I'd say a 7/10 is more accurate. JMM never even fought at that weight before (AFAIK) so how can he rate so high, given all the reach advantages, age advantage and over all size advantage. At best this too is about a 7/10. Hatton was never a great fighter by anyone's estimation, again a more realistic rating would be at best a 7.5 De la Hoya in is prime would likely beat Mayweather or come very close to it. The version that Mayweather fought wasn't close to prime and it showed as he slowed down in the later rounds (a problem he's had during his whole career) but an 8/10, I don't think so, again it's more like a 7-7.5/10 and yes he was shot, relative to where he was in his prime.
I'm a big Thurman fan that's why I care and it must make you sad that Floyd just had close fight with a guy that ducked Thurman Not to mention he made Maidana wear the highest padding gloves Everlast makes unexpectedly 24 hours before the fight lmao
Why not have a rematch with the woman Void beat up? Void fought her with bare knuckles, did she wear 24 oz. gloves?
First off, I found it funny how you say no way near an 8 because he was 'shot' but have it a 7.. Also, it's crazy that you think those guys did about the same for his legacy.. Going by just this, Pac vs the same people would have to be 6/10 or less right?