McCallum's best perfomance?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, May 29, 2011.


  1. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,868
    2,048
    Apr 1, 2005
    Toss up between Curry and Jackson for me.
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Yes it was a shame McCallum's momentum was stopped before he got that super fight. Both he, Graham and Kalambay were great fighters, but they seemed to knock each other out of contention like the murderers row did to each other
     
  3. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    you are right about those 3 being top fighters at that time. I remember that fight McCallum had with Kalambay. I think it was in Italy. Mike and his corner could have orchestrated a better title fight in this country to better follow his Curry win. I think Mike always thought that being good was all which was needed, and that everyone will fight him and he will get all the credit he wanted. He didn't realize that marketing himself and fighting the right opponents at times would have helped his career. Efficiency helps but marketing does also. The Kalambay loss took all the air out of Mike's career or another year, and by the time he got another title shot at 160, Hearns was fighting Leonard at 168 and not in Mike's weight class. The fab four were the key to Mike being remembered more fondly. He has a good place in history, but not fighting those elites will always be what is missing in his career. By the time he fought Toney and Jones, he was seen as the older guy who was slowing down.
     
  4. Liechhardt

    Liechhardt Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,510
    7
    Mar 25, 2010
    Toss up with Jackson & Curry yes. I go with Jackson coz Don had been beaten by Honeyghan 3 fights previous.
     
  5. Arminius

    Arminius Member Full Member

    482
    17
    Sep 5, 2006
    I think Jackson was his best victory. However, I think that fight was stopped too soon.
     
  6. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,429
    1,161
    Jul 19, 2004
    I voted for Jackson, Jackson was a feared Middleweight for many years to come after this with a fearsome punch and Mccallum just ate him up!! Curry is a big name but he to me was a smaller fighter moving up and was not at his peak at that slightly bigger weight and like another said Mike landed a perfect KO punch before that Curry was rolling..
     
  7. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    when Mike beat Jackson he was barely known. I used to see his name in the boxing magazine with ko 1 ko 2, but against nobodies. He stepped up big against Mike, but he was not ready. Mike beating Julian then is not the same as Mike beating him in 1989.
     
  8. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,429
    1,161
    Jul 19, 2004

    I will still take that Jackson over the rest of the list, based on what he became and how Mccallum beat him!! Jackson was unbeaten and starching everyone he fought, he was a couple of years from his peak but I would still take him for the reasons I stated in my earlier post and above.. Jackson is currently the leader in the club house :D:good
     
  9. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    well I will say this Julian Jackson's punching power was terrifying. Buster Drayton in round 3. wow. and Terry Norris and so many others.
     
  10. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,429
    1,161
    Jul 19, 2004
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhVi7cH-LaQ"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhVi7cH-LaQ[/ame]


    Love this one as well!!!!
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    No votes for the rematches with Kalambay and Toney? I think both of them showed that he was good at adapting.
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Jackson was the favourite going in, I think. Doesn't sound too obscure in my eyes.
     
  13. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    don't get me wrong he was good, but not the guy in 1989 who stopped Norris. Jackson slowed down a little in pace the next few years and picked better punches. Jackson is one of the only guys who has terrifying power. It is almost scary to watch the guys get hit by him. Solid guys like Drayton.
     
  14. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    65
    Dec 1, 2008
    is that Hamed doing the commentary? It was power but it was more. He found ways to land clean punches with full force. Not at all a lucky punch.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,144
    13,101
    Jan 4, 2008
    Perhaps. But I think this "he wasn't really at his absolute peak" gets taken to ridicolous levels on this board. It seems every fighter had about 15 minutes when beating them meant anything.

    He was around 25 and unbeaten over almost 30 pro fights. It wasn't as if he ever settled into an ultra scientific and tactical master like Hopkins. His main assets were already in place. If one just can't settle for that he was in his prime these discussions get pointless.