McCloskey: Khan, He's English and I'm Irish, Let's Do It!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by larsker, Oct 3, 2010.


  1. larsker

    larsker Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,342
    79
    Jun 5, 2010
    Who would win??

    Source boxing scene
     
  2. Mandanda

    Mandanda SkillspayBills Full Member

    25,993
    3
    Oct 21, 2008
    Let's not.......

    When we talk about leagues and classes apart this is the definition. Looking like a defensive master against the likes of Barry Morrison is one thing but Khan's a different kettle of fish. Paul would lose a one sided messy bout IMO.

    Can't fault the lad for drive though..
     
  3. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest

    How about McClosky fight someone rated in the top 20 first.

    Instead of fighting a guy ranked 10 in the uk.
     
  4. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    38
    Jan 7, 2005
    McCloskey needs to get a wriggle on (hes over 30!!) and start upping his level of opponents before this becomes a realistic match.
     
  5. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    Maybe he should give Oisin ***an a call, apparently he was a worthy enough opponent to get Khan a title shot.
     
  6. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Khan is all wrong for McCloskey. I think he'd beat him fairly handily. Late stoppage or one sided UD.
     
  7. marty

    marty Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,490
    176
    Mar 20, 2008
    As much as Im a fan of Khan, I dont think he can beat Mccloskey. Paul can punch and hes bound to land flush on Khans chin at some point.
     
  8. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Does that mean you would be hoping for Khan to win?
     
  9. skel1983

    skel1983 Guest


    The fact of the matter is McClosky is a nobody in world terms, Khan had a name through his exploits at the Olympics, I do agree Khan got his shot through being able to bring big cash to the table rather than work his way up, but using the ***en example is poor, the kid was just knocked out in 59 seconds, all fighters well the vast majority are given easy/confidence building fights after being beat so bad.

    Since Khan has been champ he is going about it the right way, Malignaggi now Maidana. My point is it's all good and well calling Khan out but why would Khan fight McClosky? Please tell me? The guy beats Maidana and he has the pick of any fighter he want's, he is probably the biggest cash cow in world boxing outside of PPV, but you think he should fight McClosky. :patsch

    Imagine the stick he woud get if he beats Maidana and everyone is expecting him to fight Bradley, Alexander, Ortiz or JMM. No he has decided to fight McClosky. I bet HBO would be licking there lips at the prospect of that fight. :roll:
     
  10. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    0
    Sep 6, 2009
    khan wud massacre him
     
  11. marty

    marty Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,490
    176
    Mar 20, 2008
    No, but Im not coming on here to slag Khan off like other posters.
     
  12. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    He should fight a Souleymane M'baye, Kendall Holt first imo.
     
  13. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    He was originally meant to fight M'Baye for the EBU which would have been a very good victory to get under his belt.
     
  14. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Another fighter looking for a big pay day.

    Khans on another level. He needs to fight his mandatory and then look at unification.
     
  15. loughlan

    loughlan Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,896
    0
    Feb 9, 2010
    I don't get it, Harrison can fight Haye, Jennings can fight Cotto, Locket can fight Pavlik, etc, etc, but McCloskey shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath as "King" Khan :lol: The ***an example is valid, you are saying McCloskey should fight a top contender but Khan's opposition was dire before he fought Kotelnik. I think it's pretty irrelevant anyway as I can't see Khan hanging onto that title for too much longer. He has been carefully managed all through his career for a reason.