McGirt: Mayweather beats Pacquiao.

Let's see:

1. Leftover?
2. Shot?
3. Over the hill?
4. JMM won twice?
5. Pacman ducking everyone including me?
6. Floyd will beat the midget roid or no roid but he has to take the test?
7. Every boxer is on PEDs except Floyd?
8. I'm still waiting for your answer?
9. Ultimatum?

That's familiar... Ah *****!

Better athlete = better opinion?

Now since Floyd is a better athlete therefore in absolute ****ing sense all opinion on Floyd is superior.

Let's apply that homie:

1. Floyd is ducking pacman.

I have a better opinion on that since Floyd is the better athlete.



Same move every time!

 

Many people would argue with validity that Marquez succeeded in both tries but got robbed on the scorecards.

 

I thought pacman was robbed on the scorecard the first time and was validated when one judge admitted the mistake.

However if its their opinion then that's fine, but to use it in a attempt to win an argument then that's ******ed.

1 draw, 1 win in favor of Pacman. These fools better check the record books.

 

Why judge someone on their worst rather than their best or even their average? You can do that same thing to any fighter in the history of boxing. Where was Floyd's invincible defense against Jose Luis Castillo? Styles make fights. On average, Pacquiao does things offensively I've rarely or ever seen any other fighter do, and he's done it against top level opposition.

You're making it sound as though Pacquiao has built his entire career on bums, and every other boxer has fought top shelf slick master boxers. *Every* top boxer's resume consists of about 80% mismatches and only 1-3 defining fights against true archrivals. Those 1-3 fights always make that fighter look mortal - that's why they're defining fights. The fact remains clear - against all the #1 rated opponents, all of the other champions, former champions and future champions, all of the fighters he was an underdog against, Pacquiao has shown an offensive arsenal rarely seen in boxing history, and unseen by any active boxer today. Ditto with Floyd and his defense.

 

If you're going to be objective about it, disregard what people complain about on message boards and go with the official results. The official results are that Pacquiao got a draw and a close win in two fights. That's what's in the record books, that's what Vegas paid out based on, that's what we go by. And it was genuinely close enough to make it anything but a robbery. Otherwise what's the point in having official results if everybody can just disregard them and use their own scorecards instead, lol.

"What do you mean Froch has one loss? Froch beat Kessler on my scorecard, so Froch is undefeated by the official Demigawd records and is the reigning supermiddleweight champion. Forget boxrec!"

 

LOL, I would love to go to my bookie and say to him, "Hey man. I know the judges had Pacquiao winning, but listen, a lot of people on eastsideboxing.com are saying Marquez was the real winner, and I bet a couple of hundred on Marquez. You...you gotta do something about that, man. How about a...a...partial payout or something?"

You know what would happen? I'd disappear is what would happen.

We have to be more objective about these things.

 

A black person favoring Floyd?

 

C'mon, don't make this about race. The man made a valid observation. Floyd is virtually unparalled at making adjustments during the course of a fight. He can find the strategy to nullify whatever it was you were doing well and make it stop working. Pacquiao hasn't shown the same level of adaptability, and he's saying that if Floyd is able to take away Pacquiao's weakside movement and angles, then Pacquiao would have to show an ability to adjust on the fly that he hasn't necessarily shown before. They're valid observations, and he would be correct at making them whether he's black or white, or whether Floyd is black or white.

 

Floyd is the only one can adjust to his opponent? So I get it, Pac is lazy idiot in the ring. atsch
Skill-wise yes Floyd has an advantage no doubt but the power of Pac will gradually deny it. :deal

 

Nobody is saying Pacquiao is incapable of making adjustments or is a lazy idiot or whatever (talk about an overreaction!). What some of us are saying is that adjustments are Floyd's thing. He's simply *the* best at it. Pacquiao has made some adjustments in fights in the past as well, but not on the level Floyd has shown. So the point is that assuming Floyd doesn't get simply steamrolled by power and offense, he is likely to out-adapt Pacquiao.

 

to be fair there's tons of black persons that favor pac.:good

 

I know a whole family of african americans that favor Pac. One of their family member is famous too but i won't be saying names.

 

Isn't it hilarious that Buddy was being bagged as the worlds worst trainer on here when he had some active fighters? Lost in just about every big fight his boxers competed in.

 

Void will never fight Pac because Void knows Pac will knock him out. Pac will knock the feathers off Void, but we will never know because of Void's cowardice!

 

What a knob. Many experts predicted Hatton to annihilate Pac and look what happened. You're too dumb to understand that this is just an opinion and the only way to find out is for them to fight.

Mayweather seems to be coming up with all these excuses and is unwilling to fight.