McKinney: Floyd is too picky and he wants all the money

but hatton still got his 50 split while pac got an additional from his 50 straight from arum's pocket. fight was saved and they fought.

meanwhile, pac offered floyd a fair 50/50 split and sadi that floyd got the fight. floyd ran away instead to fight cotto, which pac has already beaten to a pulp.

 

Thats not true, but even if it were how does that change anything? Pac still wanted more money.

God your dumb

 

it was still 50/50 but pac got an extra from arum to save the fight. all's well and they fought. everybody knows this fact.

now pac is offering a 50/50 for a floyd fight, floyd said no. why did floyd ran away instead?

 

Should of

 

Tbh he is right, and I'm a fan of Floyd. Although nobody faults Pacquiao for going back on his word for some reason.

 

HAHAH don't tell me you're gonna defend Ortiz's "cowardly actions" the same thing you criticized "*****s" of doing in your first post of this thread.

As for the incident, was it a sucker punch? Sort of.

Was it illegal? not at all.

Does Ortiz deserve as much blame for the incident as Mayweather, if not more? Yes he does.

Of-course as a boxing fan I would have rather seen the fight reach it's more natural conclusion (it was a pretty entertaining scrap), but it was 100% a legitimate win.

 

Pretty true imo.