It's as if you didn't even read your own thread title. "mention some absurd myths in boxing" He mentioned one, why does he need to specify it's a myt (as it is already specified in your own thread title) You made yourself look like a big idiot.
You could argue at times he was not conservative in style, you are spot on about him not being a back foot fighter, but come on, he was boring to the vast majority...
In the first comments of a thread you do not need to specify, but in the following pages every person begins parallel conversations so we should specify all we are talking , obviously you are waiting from your cave of rate waiting the oportunity to write your crap of the day
I wrote crap? Your reading comprehension = zero, he was pretty clear that was an absurd myth he mentioned.
the only truth is that you were waiting your oportunity in order to say this bull**** irrelevant in this thread because you mad or anything , so sorry kid, **** you
"Punchers are born not made." Such an irritating trite little aphorism. Punchers are born and made. Natural strength alone cannot produce truly world class punching power. Technique and training are required, even in a big lug like Foreman.
Tommy Hearns being an excellent example: As an amateur he could not knock out my 87 year old Gran. As a pro, I would of taken a 10 count the moment he cocked that right hand!