Mexicos Big 3 vs FLoyd

My Bringing up Raheem was not about who Morales was at the time, but more about who Raheem was. The fact that he was ONLY A GOOD BOXER and was able to OUTCLASS Morales says alot. I mean, this is the same Raheem that loss to Juarez, Freitas and got KTFO vs Funeka. Now with that being said....I get your point. Floyd vs Morales would have been a good fight.

 

El Terrible takes him IMO

 

Aston Villa don't know **** about boxing. :rofl

 

Floyd "Fantasy" Mayweather.

 

he beat the guy in your avatar. Nothing fantasy about that whooping.

 

Neither guy would beat Floyd at any point in their careers. Its not that Morales lost to Raheem at that stage of his career, its the fact that Morales said he had never faced that style of a boxer which is the slick style. They even said it in that fight. [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXG8dDGhO-M[/ame] @7:20 Lampley quotes Morales.

 

&... He'd whoop the guy in your mouth.
(Still a fantasy)

 

all three have a chance at that weight... MArquez would be a boring match since he was a little more defensive when he was younger than he is right now.

 

Morales might be able to knock him out. Morales survived against Manny in the first fight and theres no way Mayweather would outdo Manny.

 

Have you ever boxed?

 

I got into a couple of fights but I only lost one fight because his friend helped him. I got revenge because I saw him at a bar two months later and kicked his butt.

 

Morales would get his ass beat by Floyd. Morales said that he never faced a slick fighter before when he was going into the fight with Raheem and look at what happened. A 130 Mayweather would walk all over Morales. Too fast, slick, and powerful at that weight and would not slow down for ****.

 

Go suck margo concrete **** *****.

 

Floyd all day.

I love MAB, JMM, and EM, but with the speed and defense of Floyd, they all get rendered ineffective.