Mexicos Big 3 vs FLoyd

Head to head at 130, no way.... but if we are talking in a p4p sense and taking away his size advantage to even them out a bit then I think Morales/barrera have a better chance than JMM because in their primes they applied pressure better. Their defense was underrated as well, because of their wars with each other but as the Naz, zaragosa, Pac 1, and Maidana fights showed they could be very defensive if they wanted to and apply smart effective pressure.


I still have to go with floyd because hes so versatile but I think Mab and Morales would give him a very hard 12 rounder if you throw out the size advantages. If youre taking the best of them though then you have to take the best of floyd when he was young and threw combos.

 

None!! PBF at 130 was the GOAT at that weight. Too much lateral movement too much speed too much pop.:deal

 

PBF beats all three. But i would say Morales would give him the most trouble out of the three.

 

They would all truly, be very one sided ass whuppins.

 

Floyd is just all wrong for all 3.

 

The Mexican Big Three were a million times better than Castillo. IMO, all of them beat Floyd. Hell, Floyd couldnt even hurt a Marquez with a 50-inch waistline. :hi:

 

Just WTF is wrong with you? atsch

 

all 3 would get robbed of a decision....

 

:rofl

 

Castillo was at 135 bro' not 130 which was Floyds best weight

 

yes it does

did you every see Floyd at 130? that was his prime weight

 

WTF is wrong with you *******? I just saw your other thread talking about Pac will Ko Mosley in 1. Log off troll.

 

PBF was a beast at 130 almost the perfect fighter. He could box beautifully at that weight and his lateral movement was without peer at that weight. His performance against The late great Chico Corrales at 130 was the best exhibition of boxing of this era bar none.:deal

 

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHmSOtS7rWA&feature=related[/ame]

 

Corrales was severely weight-drained and had legal problems that time. You're not fooling anyone. :hi: