Michael Moorer vs Matthew Saad Muhamed

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Sister Sledge, May 14, 2008.


  1. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    Alright, this woudl be a good one. Moorer was thought to be a future ATG at this weight at one time. He never quite made it because he moved up in weight. We all know about Saad Muhamed. What would have happened it these two juggernauts met?
     
  2. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Saad would take a battering early on, rally and stop Moorer late.
     
  3. abraq

    abraq Active Member Full Member

    1,376
    19
    Sep 17, 2007
    Seconded.
     
  4. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I agree.
     
  5. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    76
    Aug 26, 2004
    Saad had excellent power.

    I wouldn't be surprised if he starched Moorer in a few rounds; Michael was slow and had bad defence.Not necessarily the kind of fighter that would jump out to an early lead over Saad.
     
  6. dpw417

    dpw417 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,461
    347
    Jul 13, 2007
    Good fight pairing. Sadd's resiliency is the main factor in this one IMO. Sadd by 11th TKO. Sadd was amazingly TOUGH and determined.
     
  7. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    How was Moorer slow? His punches were faster than Saad's, he had a better jab, and he used his jab efficiently. He was overrated at LHW by those who think he'd have been able to have beaten most anyone there, but he was not slow, and was faster than Muhammad for sure, in terms of quickness of shots, especially with the southpaw jab.
     
  8. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    76
    Aug 26, 2004
    I dunno man.Saad wasn't notably fast either, but Moorer had a terribly methodical plodding nature about him- will say it was more his footspeed and reflexes i was thinking of rather than handspeed, which i would say was on about the same level as Saad's.

    Point being he isn't no quick slick fighter like Conteh or a guy with super workrate and good legs like Yaqui lopez.

    he was a methodical accurate stalker.Saad should be able to control the pace quite well with his underrated boxing ability, which was imo better than Moorers(watch the Leslie Stewart fight for instance).

    It's not a good style matchup for Michael IMO.
     
  9. Sister Sledge

    Sister Sledge Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,129
    27
    Jul 24, 2004
    As strong as Saad was. Moorer was stronger and naturally than Saad/ The fact that Muhamed wasn't a mover plays into Moorer's hand's. Moorer could throw devastating combo's, and I think he would be too strong for Saad and ko him
     
  10. KOTF

    KOTF Bingooo Full Member

    13,448
    26
    Jun 2, 2009
    Saad would take a beating and yet still wind up with the victory
     
  11. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,188
    26,223
    Jun 26, 2009
    Moorer, even at LH, never seemed to me like he really wanted to be in the ring. When a fight heated up and a war started, he warmed to the task, but it seemed like pulling teeth to get him to apply himself.

    I go with Saad by decision -- slight lead early, Moorer rallies when they start exchanging in the middle rounds, Saad in the championship rounds to close the show in what turns out to be a very good but not great fight.
     
  12. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,542
    Jul 28, 2004
    Saad would have stomped on Moorer..are you kidding?
     
  13. The Funny Man 7

    The Funny Man 7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,867
    2,045
    Apr 1, 2005
  14. techks

    techks ATG list Killah! Full Member

    19,779
    699
    Dec 6, 2009
    I would love to see a game that shows an accurate simulation of fighters going H2H like Title Bout except where you can see the action.....in 3d.

    Many factors to consider in this fight. Saad did have boxing skill(he was a boxer-type against Mustafa in a controversial fight and he did not box/slip punches that bad in mid rounds Lopez 2) but he was more accustomed to slugging it out. I'm not sure if Moorer ever fought a puncher at lt hvy like Saad but I do know he stood in front of them mostly if not all the time at hvy but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt at lt hvy since I don't know much about him there. I do know he was always a solid technician with a great jab and very selective punch placement and at ly hvy(maybe overall too) he was a very good finisher so that's not good for Saad if he gets hurt which is a high possibility.

    I predict he beats up Saad and IF he can take and/or avoid the big shots from Saad he'll win the UD or stop Saad mid rounds. IF he can't take the punches and/or elects to go to war, Saad knocks him out. Moorer being better technician and having the much better accuracy would've made the difference most likely giving him the needed advantage to win.

    Any big punchers Moorer fought at lt hvy so I can get a better sense of his punch resistance and strategies against punchers?