Michael Moorer vs Michael Spinks at 175 and at HW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Ukrainian, Dec 4, 2015.


  1. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,461
    Jan 10, 2007
    Who was better at 175? At HW?

    Better puncher?

    Better skills?

    Better chin?

    Who would've won at LHW and at HW?

    Your opinions
     
    Saad54 and Muhammed_Ali_Durmaz like this.
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,710
    24,276
    Jan 3, 2007
    Better puncher? Moorer

    Better skills? - Spinks

    Better chin? - Spinks

    Who would've won at LHW and at HW? - Spinks at light heavy. Heavy is a tossup but leaning towards Moorer.
     
    Greg Price99 and Flash24 like this.
  3. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,461
    Jan 10, 2007
    I think soo, too.

    Spinks is underrated as a HW because of his KO1 loss to prime Tyson. I think it would've been great match say Spinks of Holmes 1 vs Moorer vs Holyfield 1
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,251
    20,918
    Sep 15, 2009
    Spinks wins both times.
     
  5. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,822
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,042
    Oct 25, 2006
    Moorer loses at both weights, imo.
    I'm more certain at 175, but Moorer I don't think has the smarts to cope with Spinks at heavyweight either.
    Spinks would be too wiley to fall into a trap of trading with Moorer, who can't beat Spinks as a boxer.
     
    Smoochie likes this.
  7. clark

    clark Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,250
    68
    Jun 15, 2005
    Moorer at heavy.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  8. Sangria

    Sangria You bleed like Mylee Full Member

    9,016
    3,814
    Nov 13, 2010
    I liked the young terror at heavyweight Moorer, the one who banged it out with Stewart and Cooper. Later on he had to settle down in order to survive the best of the best. That version, the far more cautious version gets beaten by Spinks.
     
  9. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Spinks at either weight
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,608
    44,498
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think Moorer has a good shot at either weight.
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    50,710
    24,276
    Jan 3, 2007
    While moorer didn't exactly make the best heavyweight, but he certainly was more battle tested there. I'd put all my money down on Spinks at 175 but at heavyweight? Not sure about that one.
     
    Toney F*** U likes this.
  12. lbarrow

    lbarrow Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,524
    144
    Dec 17, 2004
    Power. Moorer
    Skills. Spinks
    Chin. Fairly close.
    Spinks would win at both weights.
    Despite looking a bit strange and awkward spinks was clever and a very skillful fighter. At both weights too. Only being 200 pounds at heavyweight but still good enough to out do a lot of bigger guys
     
  13. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,910
    811
    Nov 23, 2007
    Spinks every way
     
  14. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,034
    6,748
    Sep 8, 2013
    Spinks wins at either weight
     
  15. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    147
    Dec 7, 2015
    moorer wins at hw,he could carry this weight much better,he had bigger frame,moorer was a natural Cruiser,spinks could make even 174,moorer was pure bone at lhw. moorer had much more power,if he could handle a complete fighter like holyfield he beats spinks for sure