Michael Nunn vs. Gennady Golovkin.

It really wasn't considering Michael Nunn's speed and elusiveness or his left uppercut VS Golovkin's stalking and punching ability or his wicked overhand left hook actually would have been a pretty solid debate.

Instead the debate is Golovkin haters who say no shot VS the Golovkin phallus riders who think any debate like this is a personal attack on GG.

Grow up guys it's a reasonable debate.

 

I always knew Benn would KO Nunn!

Go NiGel!

 

Your response to my post to blizzy black made no sense, and
you're telling me to grow up. Why don't you go finish grade
school so you can learn how to articulate a sentence, ******.

 

Seriously? It was a general statement to the thread as a whole. Calm down not everything is a personal attack. Telling me to learn how to articulate sentences on an internet forum? C'mon meow.

The post you referred to as the most intelligent on this thread contributed nothing to a reasonable debate. The point is Michael Nunn vs GGG is an interesting fantasy matchup let's not get all offended with how people feel the fight might go.

 

you seem new to this forum but cristo was insulting a poster who is more than likely one of the worst most bias racist posters on this forum

it didn't contribute nothing to the debate but neither does his continous biased views and racist opinions

cristos post was very accurate and basically tells blizzy's whole story

 

Right. I got that. I'm talking about his reference to Does Huevos post about picking whatever fighter to fit an agenda. If he was responding directly to Blizzy then fine, but I don't see a problem with some people maybe favoring Nunn over Golovkin.

I think it's a solid fight to discuss considering where both guys were/are in their peak at 160. Nunn has speed which Golovkin hasn't faced, and GGG is by far the best pressure fighter Nunn would have came up against.

 

i don't either but Blizzy would pick basically any black fighter he could to beat GGG without looking like a complete loon

 

Well if that's his MO whatever, def not trying to defend him.

I do think Nunn could definitely stay away from GGG if he wanted to with his major advantages in terms of speed, height, and reach. The problem is he would never hurt Golovkin staying out of his range, he had a tendency to arm punch. He also tended to lean on smaller opponents (i.e. Curry, Roldan) and initiate infighting to try and land more effective shots like his uppercut, but I think Golovkin would take him apart on the inside. If Nunn got his jab working effectively and boxed, he could beat almost anyone with how freakish of an athlete he was, but he had really bad habits that no one ever fixed and GGG has a much more technical approach and could possibly exploit those weaknesses.

 

LOL.

Wake me when the Triple Duck wins the legit Cruiserweight title...

 

:good

 

:? If you didn't already see that I was responding to blizzy blacks
post, then I stand behind my original addressing of you needing
to be scholastically trained/retrained.
Reading is fundamental.

 

Exactly, so read the above, I was referring to Dos Huevos post. Stop trying to make this a fight, I wasn't coming at you like you are now. This is an internet forum and I'm typing on a phone. I'm really not too worried about my writing and reading comprehension skills, however worried you seem to be about it.

Did you even have anything to say about GGG vs Nunn?

 

Benn also beat Rod Douglas in the ams