Another duck Who lost to R Reid? Do you mean Magee or Nardiello? They both lost to Reid. Still why did you not answer the questions
So that's a no to any placement in boxing history. OK. Go back to rehearsing with boxrec, and wait to bait the tards into your mindless traingle theories.
You have just answered a post of mine but ducked the questions posed. Henceforth another duck and another chance for you to redeem yourself This content is protected How do you pick Nunn when he lost at SMW to a 21-13-2 fighter at SMW? What were Nunns big SMW wins? What were Nunns big wins in any division where it wasnt a fighter who had come up from a lower weight? Why do you pick Nunn when looking at the form line below in that Nunn - lost to Toney who lost to Jones who Calzaghe beat - lost to Rocchigiani who lost to Eubank who Calzaghe beat - lost to Liles who lost to Mitchell who Calzaghe beat - lost to 21-13-2 Little who lost to Liles who lost to Mitchell who Calzaghe beat ??? This content is protected
Another duck. Explain how you dont think those questions mean anything. This will be good and even better when other duckers say he doesnt understand, to try and pretend the questions arent there
2nd time of telling -the original post wasn't a reply to you, so its not duck - it has no relation to your post that was made later. You see ducks everywhere. your breakfast bowls afloat with them as we speak. Have you seen a doctor, let me know. That would be one big quack to hallucinate in your breakfast. you want EVERYONE who picked Nunn toreply to you personally? What an egotistic little man you must be, to think you can order the majority of this forum to reply to you personally.
I think I get your duck obsession. Because Calzaghe will need to keep ducking 24/7 if he is to survive against Nunn.
WTF ? A prime Joe C had no chance against a prime Jones or Toney A prime Joe wouldent even have beat a prime Eubanks ffs A prime Joe C struggled with a Robin Reed for crying out loud Joe was put down by an over the hill Jones and Hopkins what do you think would have happened if he fought a prime version ? come on really A since when does the rule of fighter A beat fighter B so he could beat fighter c because fighter b has beaten fighter c the reality of Joe c is quite simple, he may well have been a true world beater but we will never know because he only fought b class opposition in his back garden for most of his career , Kessler and Lacy being his best wins. Hopkins may not of got the decision but its clear to see he was at another level skill wise.
Good question. I think we'll have to ask Bulldog. I've still got a lot of Nunn's earlier career to watch, before I could give a proper breakdown. Herol was great though, and I've no doubt that he'd have held a version of the title had been around today.
Fights should be watched from their technical and tactical standpoint, their strength and weaknesses not by picking their resume straw by straw. You can tear anybody down like that. It doesnt make sense at all (except in some fighters like Brook for example if he fights Bradley) cause its boxing not mathematics and equations.
Nunn would've stopped Herol Graham, for whoever asked that question. Nunn had a mean streak in him that's underrated. He gets falsely labeled as a "runner". The reality is, he had no problem standing his ground and trading shots when the time called for it. Graham was a bit too brittle to handle him.
Calz would beat that version of Nunn. That's not in dispute. We're talking about if he fought the PRIME Nunn of the late 80's. BTW - Nunn beat Liles clearly in my book. Frankie got a gift decision.