no Nunn was not Hearns or Jones. Hearns was Duran's generation for the most part and held title at 147 and 154 at the same weight and time Duran did, and held the 168 pound title when Duran held the 160 pound title in 1989. So that was more of a natural fight.
I give Duran virtually no chance against Nunn at 160. Physically, Nunn is just too much for the tiny Duran at middleweight, with the wrong style to boot. Nunn wide UD.
Duran's a better fighter than Starling but if he can't get inside on Nunn it doesn't mean a damn thing.
Greatest high guard I've seen but somewhat limited offensively and not a huge puncher. He'd give a lot of guys a lot of problems, but Nunn was the worst style for a guy like that.
Duran would not be successful against Nunn. Nunn moved and had fast hands. The worst style for Roberto.
Duran was better than Starling, Nunn had the style to beat both of them. I feel like I'm not getting what you are trying to say.
You say that and when I say Nunn was too tall regardless you say preaching to the choir. Duran was better than Starling yes, but Starling could punch also and he was underrated, and I think Duran overrated at times.