Michael Spinks at heavyweight: Great?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MrOliverKlozoff, Nov 18, 2011.


  1. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    I think the question here is rather about whether Spinks was a great heavyweight throughout the length of his career or not. The answer to that seems to be that he was not, due to his lack of longevity, dominance, quality record or exceptional ability as a heavyweight.
     
  2. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    good point . And unlike Spinks , Tunney even managed 2 get KOd by his faded HW opponent . But just like Walker Smith Jr. , Cassius Clay & Lucian Bute , when 1 is d favorite fighting in his home turf , that 1 is guaranteed a KO proof insurance protection in case things get out of control . :deal
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,235
    Sep 15, 2009
    I perceive the question as whether or not spinks should go down as a heavyweight great or not. For me he did achieve heavyweight greatness so the answer is yes he should. Just like douglas, rahman and braddock.

    If a man can sit atop his division i'm willing to recognise him as a great.
     
  4. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    158
    Mar 4, 2009
    That's a difference of opinion then. In my view greatness is not only getting to the top, but being able to stay at the top and the ability to do so in other eras as well.
     
  5. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    I agree with TheGreatA here. A great showing doesn't necessarily make a great fighter.

    As for Spinks at Heavyweight, in hypotheticals there are certain stylistic matchups I'd pick him in, but 100% would find 'formidable' an inappropriate term to bestow upon him.
     
  6. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,235
    Sep 15, 2009
    If I think someone can be a great in other era's I label them an all time great.
     
  7. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    great fighter but at heavyweight he was not great. The fact he won the heavyweight title against Holmes who was experienced and still good, and then won the rematch also proves something and solidifies his greatness. To win a rematch and prove it was not a fluke or anything else proves a lot.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล

    82,426
    1,478
    Sep 7, 2008
    If he'd actually got the better of the rematch I'd tend to agree.
     
  9. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    No. He was a decent/good HW who had one great night.

    This does not define a great HW.
     
  10. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    this was not Roberto Duran getting beaten easily by Ray in the rematch. Holmes came in fired up and Spinks still went the distance and it was a close fight, but he still edged it.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace

    82,092
    22,235
    Sep 15, 2009
    Mag :lol: I know we say duran is worth a mention, but in this case he actually isn't worth a mention!

    I'd like to know your score of the thought because I think larry won quite clearly; I had it 9-6.
     
  12. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    I had it a draw and thought Larry might have edged it, but I was happy Spinks won again. I have to admit I always looked forward to the comments which Larry said after he lost.
     
  13. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,581
    Jul 28, 2004
    Shame on you!!:nonono
     
  14. Thread Stealer

    Thread Stealer Loyal Member Full Member

    42,070
    3,660
    Jun 30, 2005
    Nah.

    ATG fighter, ATG LHW, but merely a good HW.
     
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    55,179
    49,445
    Apr 27, 2005