Michael Spinks vs Bob Foster At LHW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Mar 14, 2016.


  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,918
    44,740
    Apr 27, 2005
    Are you really this clueless or are you just a troll?
     
  2. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    go back and learn something
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,918
    44,740
    Apr 27, 2005
    Claiming 175 pound Spinks does not have one punch KO power is one of the most absurd comments i have ever read on any forum, not just boxing. How could you ever expect to be taken seriously :good
     
    Flash24 likes this.
  4. Westwind7

    Westwind7 New Member Full Member

    14
    9
    Jul 26, 2018
    Spinks beats Foster in all categories except punching power. His speed, defensive skills and volume of punches he dishes out stop Foster via TKO in the late rounds. I believe Yaqui Lopez at his best had the ability to beat Foster as well
     
  5. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,106
    15,589
    Dec 20, 2006
    Probably the 2 best LHWs of my lifetime. Not much difference between them as was said above, with Foster holding a slight edge in both. I just see Spinks as the better boxer who will be able to force the distance and pace of the fight controlling both. I look for Spinks to take a decision, unless Bob presses the action to much, then I think Michael stops him
     
  6. Jackomano

    Jackomano Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,273
    7,017
    Nov 22, 2014
    This. Michael Spinks was a very talented fighter, but Foster fought much better competition than Spinks and most likely lays him out in the later rounds.
     
  7. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,106
    15,589
    Dec 20, 2006
    I would say Qawi and Gregory are better than anything on Fosters resume at LHW, and I might pick Qawi over Foster
     
    NoNeck likes this.
  8. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,756
    17,819
    Apr 3, 2012
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,918
    44,740
    Apr 27, 2005
    Foster had one of the greatest jabs in history and it's definitely better than Spinks. I'd also rate his handspeed above Michael, Foster could really whip those punches out there.
     
  10. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,106
    15,589
    Dec 20, 2006
    Interesting thought on the jab. I always thought of thier jabs in a lens of Liston/Holmes. Hard to say whose was better? They utilize them different but both accomplish what thier styles need. I think of Foster as one that is a weapon but also deters crowding and controls space. Whereas I see Spinks as the quicker jab using in to control both space and pace...not sure I see ones jab as substantially better
     
  11. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,918
    44,740
    Apr 27, 2005
    Spinks has a fine jab but for me Foster's jab is absurdly good. I see it as one of the great p4p jabs personally. He's also for me the greatest hitter in history at 175. Heck he might be the greatest hitter p4p too. Not only can he knock you cold with one punch but if need be he can also accumulate and wear you down without getting frustrated like some huge bangers did. It's a great match.
     
    Longhhorn71, Flash24 and PhillyPhan69 like this.
  12. surfinghb

    surfinghb Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,660
    17,941
    Aug 26, 2017
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,126
    Jun 2, 2006
    Foster for me but it might go the distance.Spinks wasn't easy to nail.
     
  14. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,453
    9,437
    Jul 15, 2008
    I'm not sure .. both guys could really fight but I really don't remember Foster tested at 175 too much .. Michael could really box and fight but he was in wars at 175 against Johnson while it lasted, Yaqui Lopez, Eddie Davis was a tough one .. Foster was the type of fight that could decapitate you with a shot .. just not sure here ..