Michael Spinks vs. David Haye

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Boom1989, Jul 30, 2011.


  1. floyd_g.o.a.t

    floyd_g.o.a.t Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,735
    5
    Aug 7, 2010
    You can do it yourself, just click add a poll.

    Spinks would win.
     
  2. Boom1989

    Boom1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,102
    0
    Mar 26, 2011
    Poll added. Thanks. :thumbsup
     
  3. Boom1989

    Boom1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,102
    0
    Mar 26, 2011
    Who do you think is Haye's best win?
     
  4. beefman180

    beefman180 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,858
    2
    May 16, 2011
    Spinks mauls that idiot.

    Spinks = Harder to hit than Haye, hits harder than haye, better jab, better right hand, lighter on his feet, can string together combos on balance.

    There is no way Haye has a prayer here, he's not even that much bigger, and he gives away any size advantage he would have with that stance.
     
  5. daredevil1989

    daredevil1989 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Dec 9, 2007
    michael spinks is so underappreciated on here and other boxing boards one of my all time favourites haye is not in his league the guy was the most awkward and sneaky fighter ive seen. Not only that but he was classy unlike that **** talker haye
     
  6. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,307
    29,483
    Apr 4, 2005
    Haye isn't Tyson, he won't try to rush Spinks he simply isn't that kind of fighter. He'll box at arms length and look to counter like he always does. Spinks is simply the better technician and boxer and while Haye is bigger, he's not much bigger.

    Haye isn't out pointing Spinks especially not with his low workrate at heavy. Spinks outworks and outboxes Haye and gets a UD.