Michael Spinks vs Holyfield at CW (190 version)

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by kg0208, Apr 29, 2008.


Page 2 of 2
  1. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    To answer my own thread, I would go with Holyfield over 15 by late round TKO. He had great speed for a CW, good power and good boxing ability. Spinks wouldn't have been able to KO him and Holyfield would have eventually worn him down.
     
    kg0208, Apr 29, 2008
    kg0208, Apr 29, 2008
    #16
  2. dave82

    dave82 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,570
    0
    Mar 5, 2006
    I really can't decide to be honest. Both were great fighters at CW
     
    dave82, Apr 29, 2008
    dave82, Apr 29, 2008
    #17
  3. JMotrain

    JMotrain Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,682
    2,621
    Sep 30, 2005
    Holyfield UD
     
    JMotrain, Apr 30, 2008
    JMotrain, Apr 30, 2008
    #18
  4. Boom_Boom

    Boom_Boom R.I.P Boxing 6/9/12 Full Member

    38,291
    23
    Sep 21, 2006
    Holyfield by wide UD
     
    Boom_Boom, Apr 30, 2008
    Boom_Boom, Apr 30, 2008
    #19
  5. Alo2006

    Alo2006 R.I.P Sean Taylor Full Member

    10,021
    1,414
    Jun 28, 2006
    Holyfield by late TKO
     
    Alo2006, Apr 30, 2008
    Alo2006, Apr 30, 2008
    #20
  6. roscoe

    roscoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,861
    0
    Dec 26, 2006
    Holyfield threw better combinations & more volumn of punches. He was as mobile as a middleweight & a chin to boot.
     
    roscoe, Apr 30, 2008
    roscoe, Apr 30, 2008
    #21
Page 2 of 2