Michael Spinks vs Tony Tucker

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Vic-JofreBRASIL, Jan 17, 2011.


  1. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    This is a tough one. Tucker had a lot of skill and his size is a huge advantage but Spinks was a master of winning fights. I think it would be closely contested throughout. Spinks would use a lot of tricky movement and look to steal rounds with flurries of punches. Tucker would be consistent from the outside boxing and trying to put a hurt on Spinks. I think overall Tucker's size and strength advantage would allow him to dictate the fight better with his jab and land the harder punches. I think he'd probably have Spinks in trouble throughout the fight like Holmes did but Spinks craftiness would allow him to escape and for the most part the damage to go unnoticed. I think Tucker in the end gets a decision something like 9-6 or 10-5. If Spinks was to win this one he'd do it in the later rounds outworking Tucker in the last 4 or 5.
     
  2. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    Spinks would win. Tucker liked to sit around doing nothing too much.
     
  3. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,700
    2,572
    Oct 18, 2004
    At this point in time, I would say Tucker would win a unanimous decision.There was a reason Michael Spinks didn't fight him.He was too good.
     
  4. Phil_Ivey_76

    Phil_Ivey_76 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,823
    175
    Aug 26, 2013
    Michael Spinks on points
     
  5. energie

    energie Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,510
    22
    Dec 8, 2012
  6. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,670
    2,155
    Aug 26, 2004
    Spinks was a better fighter, Tucker was a big boy with some skills. I like Spinks to take the nod. I dont think Tony's size would make much of a difference and Spinks had that awkwardness that could confuse
     
  7. VVMM

    VVMM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,372
    344
    Nov 16, 2012
    You are 100% wrong.The Spinks-****ey fight was for much more bigger money.
    The Spinks-****ey was recognized as a world title fight by
    18 !!! states.
    Spinks was a 8 to 5 underdog.
    ****ey looked much more dangerous than the seemingly
    unknown -but talented- Tucker.
     
  8. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,648
    18,474
    Jun 25, 2014
  9. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Foreman also dropped his WBA title to avoid Tucker
     
  10. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Yeah Foreman was quaking in his boots at the thought of facing the lethal Tony Tucker... :rofl:rofl
     
  11. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,648
    18,474
    Jun 25, 2014
  12. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Well a man of his age and comeback plan can be excused for making such decisions, he did think he could beat a top 10 fighter, that's why he wanted Tyson. Tucker wasn't exactly the most exciting of fighters and I understand the reason Foreman didn't fancy the fight and it sure as hell wasn't because he feared him, Tucker is way overrated IMO.
     
  13. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,648
    18,474
    Jun 25, 2014
  14. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,700
    2,572
    Oct 18, 2004
    It may have been for more money, but Michael knew that Tony could kick that butt, so he avoided TNT.
     
  15. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Tony TNT Tucker??? :huh